Radical Scavenging Potential of the Phenothiazine Scaffold: A Computational Analysis

Marco Dalla Tiezza, Trevor A. Hamlin, F. Matthias Bickelhaupt, Laura Orian*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The reactivity of phenothiazine (PS), phenoselenazine (PSE), and phenotellurazine (PTE) with different reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been studied using density functional theory (DFT) in combination with the QM-ORSA (Quantum Mechanics-based Test for Overall Free Radical Scavenging Activity) protocol for an accurate kinetic rate calculation. Four radical scavenging mechanisms have been screened, namely hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), radical adduct formation (RAF), single electron transfer (SET), and the direct oxidation of the chalcogen atom. The chosen ROS are HO., HOO., and CH3OO.. PS, PSE, and PTE exhibit an excellent antioxidant activity in water regardless of the ROS due to their characteristic diffusion-controlled regime processes. For the HO. radical, the primary active reaction mechanism is, for all antioxidants, RAF. But, for HOO. and CH3OO., the dominant mechanism strongly depends on the antioxidant: HAT for PS and PSE, and SET for PTE. The scavenging efficiency decreases dramatically in lipid environment and remains only significant (via RAF) for the most reactive radical (HO.). Therefore, PS, PSE, and PTE are excellent antioxidant molecules, especially in aqueous, physiological environments where they are active against a broad spectrum of harmful radicals. There is no advantage or significant difference in the scavenging efficiency when changing the chalcogen since the reactivity mainly derives from the amino hydrogen and the aromatic sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3763-3771
Number of pages9
JournalChemMedChem
Volume16
Issue number24
Early online date18 Sept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding by different institutions and projects: Università degli Studi di Padova (P‐DiSC ‐ BIRD2018‐UNIPD: project MADS (Modeling Antioxidant Drugs: Design and Development of computer‐aided molecular Systems)), EC Research Innovation Action under the H2020 Programme (Project HPC‐EUROPA3 (INFRAIA‐2016‐1‐730897)), Fondazione Cariparo (PhD grant), VU Amsterdam, SURFsara, and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Dr. Marianna Tosato is acknowledged for providing data on the acidity of phenothiazine. Open Access Funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Padova within the CRUI‐CARE Agreement. 3

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding by different institutions and projects: Universit? degli Studi di Padova (P-DiSC - BIRD2018-UNIPD: project MAD3S (Modeling Antioxidant Drugs: Design and Development of computer-aided molecular Systems)), EC Research Innovation Action under the H2020 Programme (Project HPC-EUROPA3 (INFRAIA-2016-1-730897)), Fondazione Cariparo (PhD grant), VU Amsterdam, SURFsara, and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Dr. Marianna Tosato is acknowledged for providing data on the acidity of phenothiazine. Open Access Funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Padova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. ChemMedChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH

Keywords

  • Antioxidants
  • Density functional calculations
  • Radical scavenging
  • Selenium
  • Sulfur

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radical Scavenging Potential of the Phenothiazine Scaffold: A Computational Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this