Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making

J.L. van Gelder, R.E. de Vries

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Objectives: Test the hypothesis that dispositional self-control and morality relate to criminal decision making via different mental processing modes, a 'hot' affective mode and a 'cool' cognitive one. Methods: Structural equation modeling in two studies under separate samples of undergraduate students using scenarios describing two different types of crime, illegal downloading and insurance fraud. Both self-control and morality are operationalized through the HEXACO model of personality (Lee and Ashton in Multivariate Behav Res 39(2):329-358, 2004).Results: In Study 1, negative state affect, i.e., feelings of fear and worry evoked by a criminal prospect, and perceived risk of sanction were found to mediate the relations between both dispositions and criminal choice. In Study 2, processing mode was manipulated by having participants rely on either their thinking or on their feelings prior to deciding on whether or not to make a criminal choice. Activating a cognitive mode strengthened the relation between perceived risk and criminal choice, whereas activating an affective mode strengthened the relation between negative affect and criminal choice.Conclusion: In conjunction, these results extend research that links stable individual dispositions to proximal states that operate in the moment of decision making. The results also add to dispositional perspectives of crime by using a structure of personality that incorporates both self-control and morality. Contributions to the proximal, state, perspectives reside in the use of a new hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making that extends rational choice frameworks. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-27
    JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
    Volume30
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Decision Making
    decision making
    self-control
    morality
    Crime
    disposition
    Personality
    Emotions
    personality
    offense
    Fraud
    fraud
    Insurance
    research results
    sanction
    insurance
    Fear
    new media
    Students
    scenario

    Cite this

    @article{72f2a7db253f44a28e516862a6219d4b,
    title = "Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making",
    abstract = "Objectives: Test the hypothesis that dispositional self-control and morality relate to criminal decision making via different mental processing modes, a 'hot' affective mode and a 'cool' cognitive one. Methods: Structural equation modeling in two studies under separate samples of undergraduate students using scenarios describing two different types of crime, illegal downloading and insurance fraud. Both self-control and morality are operationalized through the HEXACO model of personality (Lee and Ashton in Multivariate Behav Res 39(2):329-358, 2004).Results: In Study 1, negative state affect, i.e., feelings of fear and worry evoked by a criminal prospect, and perceived risk of sanction were found to mediate the relations between both dispositions and criminal choice. In Study 2, processing mode was manipulated by having participants rely on either their thinking or on their feelings prior to deciding on whether or not to make a criminal choice. Activating a cognitive mode strengthened the relation between perceived risk and criminal choice, whereas activating an affective mode strengthened the relation between negative affect and criminal choice.Conclusion: In conjunction, these results extend research that links stable individual dispositions to proximal states that operate in the moment of decision making. The results also add to dispositional perspectives of crime by using a structure of personality that incorporates both self-control and morality. Contributions to the proximal, state, perspectives reside in the use of a new hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making that extends rational choice frameworks. {\circledC} 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.",
    author = "{van Gelder}, J.L. and {de Vries}, R.E.",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "1--27",
    journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
    issn = "0748-4518",
    publisher = "Springer New York",

    }

    Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making. / van Gelder, J.L.; de Vries, R.E.

    In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 30, 2014, p. 1-27.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rational misbehavior? Evaluating an integrated dual-process model of criminal decision making

    AU - van Gelder, J.L.

    AU - de Vries, R.E.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Objectives: Test the hypothesis that dispositional self-control and morality relate to criminal decision making via different mental processing modes, a 'hot' affective mode and a 'cool' cognitive one. Methods: Structural equation modeling in two studies under separate samples of undergraduate students using scenarios describing two different types of crime, illegal downloading and insurance fraud. Both self-control and morality are operationalized through the HEXACO model of personality (Lee and Ashton in Multivariate Behav Res 39(2):329-358, 2004).Results: In Study 1, negative state affect, i.e., feelings of fear and worry evoked by a criminal prospect, and perceived risk of sanction were found to mediate the relations between both dispositions and criminal choice. In Study 2, processing mode was manipulated by having participants rely on either their thinking or on their feelings prior to deciding on whether or not to make a criminal choice. Activating a cognitive mode strengthened the relation between perceived risk and criminal choice, whereas activating an affective mode strengthened the relation between negative affect and criminal choice.Conclusion: In conjunction, these results extend research that links stable individual dispositions to proximal states that operate in the moment of decision making. The results also add to dispositional perspectives of crime by using a structure of personality that incorporates both self-control and morality. Contributions to the proximal, state, perspectives reside in the use of a new hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making that extends rational choice frameworks. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

    AB - Objectives: Test the hypothesis that dispositional self-control and morality relate to criminal decision making via different mental processing modes, a 'hot' affective mode and a 'cool' cognitive one. Methods: Structural equation modeling in two studies under separate samples of undergraduate students using scenarios describing two different types of crime, illegal downloading and insurance fraud. Both self-control and morality are operationalized through the HEXACO model of personality (Lee and Ashton in Multivariate Behav Res 39(2):329-358, 2004).Results: In Study 1, negative state affect, i.e., feelings of fear and worry evoked by a criminal prospect, and perceived risk of sanction were found to mediate the relations between both dispositions and criminal choice. In Study 2, processing mode was manipulated by having participants rely on either their thinking or on their feelings prior to deciding on whether or not to make a criminal choice. Activating a cognitive mode strengthened the relation between perceived risk and criminal choice, whereas activating an affective mode strengthened the relation between negative affect and criminal choice.Conclusion: In conjunction, these results extend research that links stable individual dispositions to proximal states that operate in the moment of decision making. The results also add to dispositional perspectives of crime by using a structure of personality that incorporates both self-control and morality. Contributions to the proximal, state, perspectives reside in the use of a new hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making that extends rational choice frameworks. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

    U2 - 10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8

    DO - 10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 1

    EP - 27

    JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

    JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

    SN - 0748-4518

    ER -