Re-positioning the Dutch in the Atlantic, 1680-1800

Jessica Roitman, Gert Oostindie

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

After some decades of historical debate about the early modern Atlantic, it has become a truism that the Atlantic may better be understood as a world of connections rather than as a collection of isolated national sub-empires. Likewise, it is commonly accepted that the study of this interconnected Atlantic world should be interdisciplinary, going beyond traditional economic and political history to include the study of the circulation of people and cultures. This view was espoused and expanded upon in the issue of Itinerario on the nature of Atlantic history published thirteen years agoa-the same issue in which Pieter Emmer and Wim Klooster famously asserted that there was no Dutch Atlantic empire. Since this controversial article appeared, there has been a resurgence of interest among scholars about the role of the Dutch in the Atlantic. With Atlantic history continuing to occupy a prominent place in Anglo-American university history departments, it seems high time to appraise the output of this resurgence of interest with an historiographical essay reviewing the major works and trends in the study of the Dutch in the Atlantic. © 2012 Research Institute for History, Leiden University.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-160
Number of pages160
JournalItinerario
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Re-positioning the Dutch in the Atlantic, 1680-1800'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this