Real-time feedback on mechanical power output: Facilitating crew rowers’ compliance with prescribed training intensity

Lotte L. Lintmeijer*, A. J. Knoek Van Soest, Freek S. Robbers, Mathijs J. Hofmijster, Peter J. Beek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Athletes require feedback in order to comply with prescribed training programs designed to optimize their performance. In rowing, current feedback parameters on intensity are inaccurate. Mechanical power output is a suitable objective measure for training intensity, but due to movement restrictions related to crew rowing, it is uncertain whether crew rowers are able to adjust their intensity based on power-output feedback. The authors examined whether rowers improve compliance with prescribed power-output targets when visual real-time feedback on power output is provided in addition to commonly used feedback. Methods: A total of 16 crew rowers rowed in 3 training sessions. During the first 2 sessions, they received commonly used feedback, followed by a session with additional power-output feedback. Targets were set by their coaches before the experiment. Compliance was operationalized as accuracy (absolute difference between target and delivered power output) and consistency (high- and low-frequency variations in delivered power output). Results: Multilevel analyses indicated that accuracy and low-frequency variations improved by, respectively, 65% (P > .001) and 32% (P = .024) when additional feedback was provided. Conclusion: Compliance with power-output targets improved when crew rowers received additional feedback on power output. Two additional observations were made during the study that highlighted the relevance of power-output feedback for practice: There was a marked discrepancy between the prescribed targets and the actually delivered power output by the rowers, and coaches had difficulties perceiving improvements in rowers’ compliance with power-output targets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-309
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Funding

We are grateful to Richard Casius and Peter Verdijk for their hard and elaborate work on the technologically innovative instrumentation used in the present study. This work was funded by the “Stichting Techniek en Wetenschap” (Utrecht, the Netherlands) under Grant 12868.

FundersFunder number
Stichting Techniek en Wetenschap12868

    Keywords

    • Biomechanics
    • Coaching
    • Energetics
    • Rowing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Real-time feedback on mechanical power output: Facilitating crew rowers’ compliance with prescribed training intensity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this