Reasonable paternalism and the limits of sexual freedom.

J.W. Steutel, B. Spiecker

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

128 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This response argues that Greenspan's comment is basically incoherent, and that the position taken by Leicester and Cooke has unacceptable practical consequences. Greenspan admits that many people with 'mental retardation' lack adult decision-making capacities, but at the same time assumes that they have these very capacities in assigning them freedom rights. Leicester and Cooke consistently argue that people with 'mental retardation' do have adult reasoning powers and therefore should be given freedom rights. But this position has the rather disquieting implication that both the practice of treating 'mental retardation' as an exempting condition and the practice of giving them important special welfare rights seem to loose their justification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-194
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Moral Education
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reasonable paternalism and the limits of sexual freedom.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this