Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships under the ECHR: Till Death – or the Lack of European Consensus – Do Us Part

Johan Lievens, Nele Verbrugghe

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) accommodates the strongly diverging attitudes towards the protection of LGBTI+ rights within the Council of Europe. Recent ECtHR case-law on access to civil unions and residence permits for same-sex couples is compared with the case-law on access to same-sex marriage – which the Court does not consider to be required by the Convention. The authors analyse and contrast the ECtHR’s use of the ‘European consensus’, ‘margin of appreciation’ and ‘living instrument’ doctrines in both sets of cases. Finally, the specific position of the EU is addressed, as well as the extent to which EU case-law may contribute to the existence of a European consensus.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCan We Still Afford Human Rights?
Subtitle of host publicationCritical Reflections on Universality, Proliferation and Costs
EditorsJan Wouters, Koen Lemmens, Thomas Van Poecke, Marie Bourguignon
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Chapter5
Pages85-112
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781839100321
ISBN (Print)9781839100314
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameLeuven Global Governance series
PublisherEdward Elgar

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships under the ECHR: Till Death – or the Lack of European Consensus – Do Us Part'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this