Abstract
As philosophers in the business of a very multifaceted research domain—i.e., Conspiracy Theory Theory—we believe that the interdisciplinarity of our research is not just important, but can promote and advance the fruitfulness of integrative (and thereby more resourceful) research endeavors more generally. As such, we find the resurrection of the Le Monde debate in these pages disheartening. We believe that, as our societies develop and become increasingly complex, so do our academic objects, and these modern complexities often entail a requirement for various disciplines to come and work together to obtain a comprehensive and fruitful academic result […].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-50 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Early online date | 27 Oct 2022 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciling Conceptual Confusions in the Le Monde Debate on Conspiracy Theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver