TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstruction of Concomitant Ruptures of Peroneus Longus and Brevis Tendons
T2 - A Case Report and Literature Review
AU - Kadir, S.
AU - Rassir, R.
AU - Joor, F.
AU - Nolte, P.
AU - Vergroesen, D.A.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - © 2020Peroneal tendon ruptures are caused by inversion trauma of the ankle and are often mistaken for simple ankle sprains. As a result, peroneal tendon ruptures are underdiagnosed; especially a concomitant rupture of both the brevis and longus tendons is extremely rare. We describe the case of concomitant rupture of both peroneal tendons in a 50-year-old male, diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging and treated with a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer. The flexor digitorum longus tendon was mobilized, transferred laterally, and anchored to the distal and proximal stubs of the peroneal tendons, acting like a bridge. At final follow-up (19 months after index surgery), the patient was relieved from his symptoms and had full range of motion. Imaging demonstrated a durable reconstruction. Evidence for the preferred surgical treatment is lacking in the current literature and is limited to small case series and case reports. Randomized prospective studies should be conducted to determine the optimal treatment. Based on current available data, surgical technique should be based on clinical observation (e.g., tendon quality) and imaging findings.
AB - © 2020Peroneal tendon ruptures are caused by inversion trauma of the ankle and are often mistaken for simple ankle sprains. As a result, peroneal tendon ruptures are underdiagnosed; especially a concomitant rupture of both the brevis and longus tendons is extremely rare. We describe the case of concomitant rupture of both peroneal tendons in a 50-year-old male, diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging and treated with a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer. The flexor digitorum longus tendon was mobilized, transferred laterally, and anchored to the distal and proximal stubs of the peroneal tendons, acting like a bridge. At final follow-up (19 months after index surgery), the patient was relieved from his symptoms and had full range of motion. Imaging demonstrated a durable reconstruction. Evidence for the preferred surgical treatment is lacking in the current literature and is limited to small case series and case reports. Randomized prospective studies should be conducted to determine the optimal treatment. Based on current available data, surgical technique should be based on clinical observation (e.g., tendon quality) and imaging findings.
U2 - 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.09.007
DO - 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.09.007
M3 - Article
SN - 1067-2516
VL - 60
SP - 399
EP - 403
JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
JF - Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
IS - 2
ER -