Abstract
PURPOSE:
To describe the use of a computer-aided three-dimensional planning protocol in combination with previously placed reference elements and computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology to restore the partially edentulous patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Mini-implants and/or reference brackets were inserted or positioned in specified locations in a test cast and in two patients prior to imaging to act as definitive fiducial markers. This served as a fixed base to better define a setup for the fabrication of a surgical template used during computed tomographic imaging. A simulated partially edentulous maxilla was used for the study, and two partially edentulous patients participated. With the CT images, a CAD/CAM superstructure was created prior to surgery and inserted immediately after surgery. Fit of the prosthesis was assessed using three-dimensional tension measurements with strain gauges.
RESULTS:
Mean misfit for all implants in the x-, y-, and z-axes was 26.6, 24.8, and 10.4 μm, respectively. The total misfit calculated according to the Pythagorean theorem was 42.6 μm.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon this pilot study in two patients and an in vitro analysis, it appears that the use of reproducible fiducial markers consisting of mini-implants and reference brackets results in the fabrication of an acceptably accurately fitting definitive prosthesis prior to implant placement.
To describe the use of a computer-aided three-dimensional planning protocol in combination with previously placed reference elements and computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology to restore the partially edentulous patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Mini-implants and/or reference brackets were inserted or positioned in specified locations in a test cast and in two patients prior to imaging to act as definitive fiducial markers. This served as a fixed base to better define a setup for the fabrication of a surgical template used during computed tomographic imaging. A simulated partially edentulous maxilla was used for the study, and two partially edentulous patients participated. With the CT images, a CAD/CAM superstructure was created prior to surgery and inserted immediately after surgery. Fit of the prosthesis was assessed using three-dimensional tension measurements with strain gauges.
RESULTS:
Mean misfit for all implants in the x-, y-, and z-axes was 26.6, 24.8, and 10.4 μm, respectively. The total misfit calculated according to the Pythagorean theorem was 42.6 μm.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon this pilot study in two patients and an in vitro analysis, it appears that the use of reproducible fiducial markers consisting of mini-implants and reference brackets results in the fabrication of an acceptably accurately fitting definitive prosthesis prior to implant placement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 707-717 |
Journal | International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |