Reforming institutional review board policy: Issues in implementation and field research

D. Yanow; P. Schwartz-Shea

doi:10.1017/S1049096508080864

Reforming institutional review board policy: Issues in implementation and field research

D. Yanow, P. Schwartz-Shea

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Political science as a discipline has largely ignored research regulatory policies associated with institutional review boards (IRBs). Many political scientists-especially those in the senior ranks-are either oblivious to the existence of IRBs or actively decide to sidestep them by not submitting their proposals for review. Based on research conducted since 2004, we hold that APSA members at all ranks of the profession, along with political scientists worldwide, need to be concerned, not to say alarmed, about IRB policy. Why this sense of urgency, and why now? Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	483-494
Number of pages	12
Journal	PS : Political Science and Politics
Volume	401
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508080864
Publication status	Published - 2008

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1017/S1049096508080864

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{5d3177a1f1db4fab932b569dec36190b,

title = "Reforming institutional review board policy: Issues in implementation and field research",

abstract = "Political science as a discipline has largely ignored research regulatory policies associated with institutional review boards (IRBs). Many political scientists-especially those in the senior ranks-are either oblivious to the existence of IRBs or actively decide to sidestep them by not submitting their proposals for review. Based on research conducted since 2004, we hold that APSA members at all ranks of the profession, along with political scientists worldwide, need to be concerned, not to say alarmed, about IRB policy. Why this sense of urgency, and why now? Copyright {\textcopyright} The American Political Science Association 2008.",

author = "D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1017/S1049096508080864",

language = "English",

volume = "401",

pages = "483--494",

journal = "PS : Political Science and Politics",

issn = "1049-0965",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming institutional review board policy: Issues in implementation and field research

AU - Yanow, D.

AU - Schwartz-Shea, P.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Political science as a discipline has largely ignored research regulatory policies associated with institutional review boards (IRBs). Many political scientists-especially those in the senior ranks-are either oblivious to the existence of IRBs or actively decide to sidestep them by not submitting their proposals for review. Based on research conducted since 2004, we hold that APSA members at all ranks of the profession, along with political scientists worldwide, need to be concerned, not to say alarmed, about IRB policy. Why this sense of urgency, and why now? Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008.

AB - Political science as a discipline has largely ignored research regulatory policies associated with institutional review boards (IRBs). Many political scientists-especially those in the senior ranks-are either oblivious to the existence of IRBs or actively decide to sidestep them by not submitting their proposals for review. Based on research conducted since 2004, we hold that APSA members at all ranks of the profession, along with political scientists worldwide, need to be concerned, not to say alarmed, about IRB policy. Why this sense of urgency, and why now? Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008.

U2 - 10.1017/S1049096508080864

DO - 10.1017/S1049096508080864

M3 - Article

SN - 1049-0965

VL - 401

SP - 483

EP - 494

JO - PS : Political Science and Politics

JF - PS : Political Science and Politics

IS - 2

ER -

Reforming institutional review board policy: Issues in implementation and field research

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Fingerprint

Cite this