Abstract
This paper aims to contribute to The History of the Family by researching the historical relationship between family and state, and the roles that the concepts of 'race' and 'mixture' played. To this end, it analyzes the regulation of Chinese–Dutch marriages in the interwar period and Second World War in the Netherlands. It argues that the ways in which these interracial marriages were regulated were informed by colonial discourses on the Chinese as racialized others. This resulted in a systematic pattern of exclusion of Chinese migrants in the Netherlands, in which they were registered, fingerprinted, counted and deported. Part of these discourses focused on Chinese 'interracial' marriages with Dutch white women. This resulted in the 'regulation of mixture' in which state officials aimed to prevent such marriages, through migration law, document requirements and premarital counseling. During the war, these marriages were considered a 'racial shame' and relationships were broken up by arresting Chinese husbands before marriage. More research is needed to learn more about the extent of these practices and to know whether they were applied to racialized groups other than Chinese.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 539-559 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | History of the Family |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Jul 2019 |
Funding
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 725238 |
| European Research Council |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Chinese migrants
- Mixed marriages
- Second World War
- raace
- regulation of mixture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating Dutch–Chinese marriages and relationships in the Netherlands (1920–1945)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver