Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis

Laura M. Oudenhoven, Judith M. Boes, Laura Hak, Gert S. Faber, Han Houdijk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Running specific prostheses (RSP) are designed to replicate the spring-like behaviour of the human leg during running, by incorporating a real physical spring in the prosthesis. Leg stiffness is an important parameter in running as it is strongly related to step frequency and running economy. To be able to select a prosthesis that contributes to the required leg stiffness of the athlete, it needs to be known to what extent the behaviour of the prosthetic leg during running is dominated by the stiffness of the prosthesis or whether it can be regulated by adaptations of the residual joints. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how athletes with an RSP could regulate leg stiffness during distance running at different step frequencies. Seven endurance runners with an unilateral transtibial amputation performed five running trials on a treadmill at a fixed speed, while different step frequencies were imposed (preferred step frequency (PSF) and −15%, −7.5%, +7.5% and +15% of PSF). Among others, step time, ground contact time, flight time, leg stiffness and joint kinetics were measured for both legs. In the intact leg, increasing step frequency was accompanied by a decrease in both contact and flight time, while in the prosthetic leg contact time remained constant and only flight time decreased. In accordance, leg stiffness increased in the intact leg, but not in the prosthetic leg. Although a substantial contribution of the residual leg to total leg stiffness was observed, this contribution did not change considerably with changing step frequency. Amputee athletes do not seem to be able to alter prosthetic leg stiffness to regulate step frequency during running. This invariant behaviour indicates that RSP stiffness has a large effect on total leg stiffness and therefore can have an important influence on running performance. Nevertheless, since prosthetic leg stiffness was considerably lower than stiffness of the RSP, compliance of the residual leg should not be ignored when selecting RSP stiffness.

LanguageEnglish
Pages42-48
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume51
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Amputees
Running
Athletes
Prostheses and Implants
Leg
Durability
Prosthetics
Stiffness
Exercise equipment
Joints

Keywords

  • Leg stiffness
  • Lower limb prosthesis
  • Natural frequency
  • Running
  • Spring-mass model

Cite this

@article{3074aed17d2f4452bff4cb03cf9bac42,
title = "Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis",
abstract = "Running specific prostheses (RSP) are designed to replicate the spring-like behaviour of the human leg during running, by incorporating a real physical spring in the prosthesis. Leg stiffness is an important parameter in running as it is strongly related to step frequency and running economy. To be able to select a prosthesis that contributes to the required leg stiffness of the athlete, it needs to be known to what extent the behaviour of the prosthetic leg during running is dominated by the stiffness of the prosthesis or whether it can be regulated by adaptations of the residual joints. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how athletes with an RSP could regulate leg stiffness during distance running at different step frequencies. Seven endurance runners with an unilateral transtibial amputation performed five running trials on a treadmill at a fixed speed, while different step frequencies were imposed (preferred step frequency (PSF) and −15{\%}, −7.5{\%}, +7.5{\%} and +15{\%} of PSF). Among others, step time, ground contact time, flight time, leg stiffness and joint kinetics were measured for both legs. In the intact leg, increasing step frequency was accompanied by a decrease in both contact and flight time, while in the prosthetic leg contact time remained constant and only flight time decreased. In accordance, leg stiffness increased in the intact leg, but not in the prosthetic leg. Although a substantial contribution of the residual leg to total leg stiffness was observed, this contribution did not change considerably with changing step frequency. Amputee athletes do not seem to be able to alter prosthetic leg stiffness to regulate step frequency during running. This invariant behaviour indicates that RSP stiffness has a large effect on total leg stiffness and therefore can have an important influence on running performance. Nevertheless, since prosthetic leg stiffness was considerably lower than stiffness of the RSP, compliance of the residual leg should not be ignored when selecting RSP stiffness.",
keywords = "Leg stiffness, Lower limb prosthesis, Natural frequency, Running, Spring-mass model",
author = "Oudenhoven, {Laura M.} and Boes, {Judith M.} and Laura Hak and Faber, {Gert S.} and Han Houdijk",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.058",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "42--48",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis. / Oudenhoven, Laura M.; Boes, Judith M.; Hak, Laura; Faber, Gert S.; Houdijk, Han.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 51, 25.01.2017, p. 42-48.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis

AU - Oudenhoven, Laura M.

AU - Boes, Judith M.

AU - Hak, Laura

AU - Faber, Gert S.

AU - Houdijk, Han

PY - 2017/1/25

Y1 - 2017/1/25

N2 - Running specific prostheses (RSP) are designed to replicate the spring-like behaviour of the human leg during running, by incorporating a real physical spring in the prosthesis. Leg stiffness is an important parameter in running as it is strongly related to step frequency and running economy. To be able to select a prosthesis that contributes to the required leg stiffness of the athlete, it needs to be known to what extent the behaviour of the prosthetic leg during running is dominated by the stiffness of the prosthesis or whether it can be regulated by adaptations of the residual joints. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how athletes with an RSP could regulate leg stiffness during distance running at different step frequencies. Seven endurance runners with an unilateral transtibial amputation performed five running trials on a treadmill at a fixed speed, while different step frequencies were imposed (preferred step frequency (PSF) and −15%, −7.5%, +7.5% and +15% of PSF). Among others, step time, ground contact time, flight time, leg stiffness and joint kinetics were measured for both legs. In the intact leg, increasing step frequency was accompanied by a decrease in both contact and flight time, while in the prosthetic leg contact time remained constant and only flight time decreased. In accordance, leg stiffness increased in the intact leg, but not in the prosthetic leg. Although a substantial contribution of the residual leg to total leg stiffness was observed, this contribution did not change considerably with changing step frequency. Amputee athletes do not seem to be able to alter prosthetic leg stiffness to regulate step frequency during running. This invariant behaviour indicates that RSP stiffness has a large effect on total leg stiffness and therefore can have an important influence on running performance. Nevertheless, since prosthetic leg stiffness was considerably lower than stiffness of the RSP, compliance of the residual leg should not be ignored when selecting RSP stiffness.

AB - Running specific prostheses (RSP) are designed to replicate the spring-like behaviour of the human leg during running, by incorporating a real physical spring in the prosthesis. Leg stiffness is an important parameter in running as it is strongly related to step frequency and running economy. To be able to select a prosthesis that contributes to the required leg stiffness of the athlete, it needs to be known to what extent the behaviour of the prosthetic leg during running is dominated by the stiffness of the prosthesis or whether it can be regulated by adaptations of the residual joints. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how athletes with an RSP could regulate leg stiffness during distance running at different step frequencies. Seven endurance runners with an unilateral transtibial amputation performed five running trials on a treadmill at a fixed speed, while different step frequencies were imposed (preferred step frequency (PSF) and −15%, −7.5%, +7.5% and +15% of PSF). Among others, step time, ground contact time, flight time, leg stiffness and joint kinetics were measured for both legs. In the intact leg, increasing step frequency was accompanied by a decrease in both contact and flight time, while in the prosthetic leg contact time remained constant and only flight time decreased. In accordance, leg stiffness increased in the intact leg, but not in the prosthetic leg. Although a substantial contribution of the residual leg to total leg stiffness was observed, this contribution did not change considerably with changing step frequency. Amputee athletes do not seem to be able to alter prosthetic leg stiffness to regulate step frequency during running. This invariant behaviour indicates that RSP stiffness has a large effect on total leg stiffness and therefore can have an important influence on running performance. Nevertheless, since prosthetic leg stiffness was considerably lower than stiffness of the RSP, compliance of the residual leg should not be ignored when selecting RSP stiffness.

KW - Leg stiffness

KW - Lower limb prosthesis

KW - Natural frequency

KW - Running

KW - Spring-mass model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006897469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006897469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.058

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 42

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

T2 - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

ER -