TY - JOUR
T1 - Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery
AU - Oosterhuis, Teddy
AU - Costa, Leonardo O.P.
AU - Maher, Christopher G.
AU - de Vet, Henrica C.W.
AU - van Tulder, Maurits W.
AU - Ostelo, Raymond W.J.G.
PY - 2014/3/14
Y1 - 2014/3/14
N2 - Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery. To determine whether active rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is more effective than no treatment, and to describe in the content, duration and intensity of the rehabilitation programmes included in this review, and for none of them was high- or moderate-quality evidence identified. Exercise programmes starting four to six weeks postsurgery seem to lead to a faster decrease in pain and disability than no treatment, with small to medium effect sizes, and high-intensity exercise programmes seem to lead to a slightly faster decrease in pain and disability than is seen with low-intensity programmes, but the overall quality of the evidence is only low to very low. No significant differences were noted between supervised and home exercise programmes for pain relief, disability or global perceived effect. None of the trials reported an increase in reoperation rate after first-time lumbar surgery. High-quality randomised controlled trials are strongly needed.
AB - Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery. To determine whether active rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is more effective than no treatment, and to describe in the content, duration and intensity of the rehabilitation programmes included in this review, and for none of them was high- or moderate-quality evidence identified. Exercise programmes starting four to six weeks postsurgery seem to lead to a faster decrease in pain and disability than no treatment, with small to medium effect sizes, and high-intensity exercise programmes seem to lead to a slightly faster decrease in pain and disability than is seen with low-intensity programmes, but the overall quality of the evidence is only low to very low. No significant differences were noted between supervised and home exercise programmes for pain relief, disability or global perceived effect. None of the trials reported an increase in reoperation rate after first-time lumbar surgery. High-quality randomised controlled trials are strongly needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907424432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907424432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3
DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24627325
SN - 1469-493X
VL - 2014
SP - 1
EP - 105
JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
IS - 3
M1 - CD003007
ER -