Reimagining the ICC: Exploring practitioners’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the international criminal court

Samaria Muhammad, Barbora Holá, Anja Dirkzwager

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This exploratory study documents International Criminal Court (icc) personnel’s perspectives on the effectiveness of the icc. It examines practitioner views on the icc’s goals, strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness. Interviews with nine professionals from the Office of the Prosecutor, Defense, and Chambers reveal several themes. Professionals agreed upon the icc’s greatest strengths: its foundation and its symbolic value. They also named common weaknesses, including its reliance on state cooperation, challenges in administrative functions, and, from the perspective of largely Defense personnel, an unfair disadvantage against the Defense. While personnel often agreed upon which factors needed improvement, they diverged on precisely how to improve them. However, they alluded to several potential paths forward. Interviews ultimately suggested the Court has several areas requiring improvement, but a solid foundation and considerable potential. These interviews coincide with ongoing reviews of the Court, providing a fuller picture of its effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-153
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Criminal Law Review
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© samaria muhammad, barbora holá and anja dirkzwager, 2021.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Effectiveness
  • Goals
  • International Criminal Court (icc)
  • Interviews
  • Personnel views

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reimagining the ICC: Exploring practitioners’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the international criminal court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this