Relata-specificity: A Response to Vallicella

A. Betti, J.W wieland

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

111 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to Vallicella's 'Relations, Monism, and the Vindication of Bradley's Regress' (2002), if relations are to relate their relata, some special operator must do the relating. No other options will do. In this paper we reject Vallicella's conclusion by considering an important option that becomes visible only if we hold onto a precise distinction between the following three feature-pairs of relations: internality/externality, universality/particularity, relata-specificity/relataunspecificity. The conclusion we reach is that if external relations are to relate their relata, they must be relata-specific (and no special operator is needed). As it eschews unmereological complexes, this outcome is of relevance to defenders of the extensionality of composition. © 2008 Editorial Board of dialectica.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-524
JournalDialectica
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relata-specificity: A Response to Vallicella'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this