Abstract
The reliability of a newly developed tooth wear grading system was assessed both clinically and on dental casts by two observers using 20 participants. The reliability of clinical occlusal/incisal tooth wear grading was fair-to-good to excellent, while that of most of the clinical nonocclusal/nonincisal grades was at least fair-to-good. Dental cast assessment frequently yielded poor reliabilities, especially for nonocclusal/nonincisal surfaces. Hence, occlusal/incisal wear could be graded more reliably than nonocclusal/nonincisal wear, while the clinical assessment of tooth wear was more reliable than the grading of dental casts.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 388-390 |
| Journal | The International Journal of Prosthodontics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver