Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes

Renske Huffmeijer*, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Lenneke R.A. Alink, Marinus H. Van IJzendoorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The reliability of event-related potentials (ERPs) is an important factor determining the value of studies relating ERP components to individual differences. However, studies examining the reliability of ERPs are surprisingly scarce. The current study examines the test-retest reliability of ERP components (VPP, N170, MFN, FRN, P3, and LPP) in response to feedback stimuli combining performance feedback with emotional faces in a sample of healthy female adults. In general, ERP amplitudes showed adequate to excellent test-retest reliability across a 4-week interval, depending on the component studied. Averaging ERP amplitudes across several electrodes yielded more reliable measurements than relying on a single electrode. Averaging across multiple trials substantially improved reliability. We recommend including at least 30 trials for early, spatio-temporally narrowly distributed components (such as VPP), but substantially more, at least 60 trials, for later, broadly distributed components such as the P3.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-22
Number of pages10
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 May 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Emotional facial expressions
  • Event-related potentials
  • Feedback
  • Retest reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this