Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reliability of IMU-based balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Balance is often affected after stroke, severely impacting activities of daily life. Conventional testing methods to assess balance provide limited information, as they are subjected to floor and ceiling effects. Instrumented tests, for instance using inertial measurement units, offer a feasible and promising alternative. Research question: We examined whether postural sway can reliably be measured in sitting and standing balance in people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation using a single inertial measurement unit. Additionally, we assessed to what extent averaging two measurements would improve test-retest reliability compared to a single measurement, and if sway features can potentially be used to monitor progression. Method: Forty participants performed two assessments with a test-retest interval of 24 h. Each assessment consisted of one sitting and four standing balance conditions (eyes open, feet together, eyes closed and foam). The standing balance conditions were performed twice during both assessments. In total, 35 sway features were calculated for each condition. For the standing balance conditions, these were calculated for both single test-retest measurement and the average of the two test and retest measurements. We determined the reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient for both single and averaged measurements. Additionally, the minimal detectable change and the relative minimal detectable change were computed. Results: The single and averaged measurements resulted in 22 sitting, 30 & 32 eyes open, 27 & 22 feet together, 28 & 33 eyes closed and 23 & 13 foam sway features with good-excellent reliability. Overall, the difference between intraclass correlation coefficient values of the single and averaged measurements was small and inconsistent. The relative minimal detectable change ranged between 0.5 and 1.5 standard deviation. Significance: Sitting and standing balance can reliably be assessed in people after stroke in clinical rehabilitation with a single measurement using one inertial measurement unit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-68
Number of pages7
JournalGait and Posture
Volume98
Early online date12 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study is independent research and was funded by: SIA-RAAK ( RAAK.PRO.03.006 ). S.M.Bruijn was funded by a VIDI grant ( 016.Vidi.178.014 ) from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Funding Information:
This study is independent research and was funded by: SIA-RAAK (RAAK.PRO.03.006). S.M.Bruijn was funded by a VIDI grant (016.Vidi.178.014) from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Funding

This study is independent research and was funded by: SIA-RAAK ( RAAK.PRO.03.006 ). S.M.Bruijn was funded by a VIDI grant ( 016.Vidi.178.014 ) from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This study is independent research and was funded by: SIA-RAAK (RAAK.PRO.03.006). S.M.Bruijn was funded by a VIDI grant (016.Vidi.178.014) from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cerebral vascular accident
  • Postural stability
  • Posturography
  • Recovery
  • Sensors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of IMU-based balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this