Religious exclusivism unlimited

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    660 Downloads (Pure)


    Like David Silver before them, Erik Baldwin and Michael Thune argue that the facts of religious pluralism present an insurmountable challenge to the rationality of basic exclusive religious belief as construed by Reformed Epistemology. I will show that their argument is unsuccessful. First, their claim that the facts of religious pluralism make it necessary for the religious exclusivist to support her exclusive beliefs with significant reasons is one that the reformed epistemologist has the resources to reject. Secondly, they fail to demonstrate that it is impossible for basic religious beliefs to return to their properly basic state after defeaters against them have been defeated. Finally, I consider whether there is perhaps a similar but better argument in the neighbourhood and conclude in the negative. Reformed Epistemology's defence of exclusivism thus remains undefeated. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)449-463
    Number of pages15
    JournalReligious Studies
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2011


    Dive into the research topics of 'Religious exclusivism unlimited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this