Abstract
Incentive instruments like asset ownership and performance pay often have to strike a balance between the productive incentives and the rent-seeking incentives they provide. Standard theory predicts that these instruments become less attractive when the effectiveness of rent-seeking activities increases. In contrast, theories that emphasize the importance of reciprocity suggest that this relationship may go the other way around. In this paper we test these predictions by means of a laboratory experiment. By and large our findings confirm standard theory. Incentive instruments typically become less attractive when the scope for rent-seeking activities increases. However, reciprocity motivations do seem to mitigate the adverse effects of rent-seeking opportunities to a considerable extent. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 630-643 |
| Journal | European Economic Review |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rent-seeking versus productive activities in a multi-task experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver