Replicability and replication in the humanities

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A large number of scientists and several news platforms have, over the last few years, been speaking of a replication crisis in various academic disciplines, especially the biomedical and social sciences. This paper answers the novel question of whether we should also pursue replication in the humanities. First, I create more conceptual clarity by defining, in addition to the term “humanities,” various key terms in the debate on replication, such as “reproduction” and “replicability.” In doing so, I pay attention to what is supposed to be the object of replication: certain studies, particular inferences, of specific results. After that, I spell out three reasons for thinking that replication in the humanities is not possible and argue that they are unconvincing. Subsequently, I give a more detailed case for thinking that replication in the humanities is possible. Finally, I explain why such replication in the humanities is not only possible, but also desirable.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Integrity and Peer Review
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Replicability and replication in the humanities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this