Reply to Lucas & Henneberg: Are human faces unique?

Ronald Meester, Bart Preneel, Sylvia Wenmackers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper offers a response to the 2015 article of Lucas and Henneberg “Are human faces unique?” (Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 514.e1–514.e6), as well as to the subsequent popularization thereof. In the first part, we assess the probabilistic claims made by the authors and find crucial parts to be unsupported. In particular, the authors offer no probabilistic model on which to base their conclusions. Even if we disregard the errors identified in the first part, we find a troubling discrepancy between the published findings and the popular summary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-220
Number of pages4
JournalForensic Science International
Volume297
Early online date21 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Statistical Models

Keywords

  • Facial recognition
  • Forensics
  • Match probability
  • Video surveillance

Cite this

Meester, Ronald ; Preneel, Bart ; Wenmackers, Sylvia. / Reply to Lucas & Henneberg : Are human faces unique?. In: Forensic Science International. 2019 ; Vol. 297. pp. 217-220.
@article{6741076187eb4bf49409543b150e3ccb,
title = "Reply to Lucas & Henneberg: Are human faces unique?",
abstract = "This paper offers a response to the 2015 article of Lucas and Henneberg “Are human faces unique?” (Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 514.e1–514.e6), as well as to the subsequent popularization thereof. In the first part, we assess the probabilistic claims made by the authors and find crucial parts to be unsupported. In particular, the authors offer no probabilistic model on which to base their conclusions. Even if we disregard the errors identified in the first part, we find a troubling discrepancy between the published findings and the popular summary.",
keywords = "Facial recognition, Forensics, Match probability, Video surveillance",
author = "Ronald Meester and Bart Preneel and Sylvia Wenmackers",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.038",
language = "English",
volume = "297",
pages = "217--220",
journal = "Forensic Science International",
issn = "0379-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

Reply to Lucas & Henneberg : Are human faces unique? / Meester, Ronald; Preneel, Bart; Wenmackers, Sylvia.

In: Forensic Science International, Vol. 297, 04.2019, p. 217-220.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Lucas & Henneberg

T2 - Are human faces unique?

AU - Meester, Ronald

AU - Preneel, Bart

AU - Wenmackers, Sylvia

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - This paper offers a response to the 2015 article of Lucas and Henneberg “Are human faces unique?” (Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 514.e1–514.e6), as well as to the subsequent popularization thereof. In the first part, we assess the probabilistic claims made by the authors and find crucial parts to be unsupported. In particular, the authors offer no probabilistic model on which to base their conclusions. Even if we disregard the errors identified in the first part, we find a troubling discrepancy between the published findings and the popular summary.

AB - This paper offers a response to the 2015 article of Lucas and Henneberg “Are human faces unique?” (Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 514.e1–514.e6), as well as to the subsequent popularization thereof. In the first part, we assess the probabilistic claims made by the authors and find crucial parts to be unsupported. In particular, the authors offer no probabilistic model on which to base their conclusions. Even if we disregard the errors identified in the first part, we find a troubling discrepancy between the published findings and the popular summary.

KW - Facial recognition

KW - Forensics

KW - Match probability

KW - Video surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062261524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062261524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.038

DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.038

M3 - Article

VL - 297

SP - 217

EP - 220

JO - Forensic Science International

JF - Forensic Science International

SN - 0379-0738

ER -