Abstract
This paper offers a response to the 2015 article of Lucas and Henneberg “Are human faces unique?” (Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 514.e1–514.e6), as well as to the subsequent popularization thereof. In the first part, we assess the probabilistic claims made by the authors and find crucial parts to be unsupported. In particular, the authors offer no probabilistic model on which to base their conclusions. Even if we disregard the errors identified in the first part, we find a troubling discrepancy between the published findings and the popular summary.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 217-220 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Forensic Science International |
| Volume | 297 |
| Early online date | 21 Feb 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Facial recognition
- Forensics
- Match probability
- Video surveillance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Lucas & Henneberg: Are human faces unique?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver