Reporting on Police Interrogations: Selection effects and bias related to the use of text, video and audiotape

M. Malsch, Robin Kranendonk, J. de Keijser, M. Komter, M. de Boer, H. Elffers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

As a result of technological developments, digital recording of police interrogations has become a straightforward option in many legal systems. Videos of interrogations can now be used during criminal proceedings, instead of or in addition to written reports. Text, image and sound have different effects in the criminal justice system. This article first discusses the existing research into these effects. A study is presented in which written reports of 55 real-life Dutch police interrogations of suspects are compared to the audio and video recordings. Interrogations appear to be rigorously summarized and edited in the written reports, which may lead to biased or misinformed judgments. Risks for fact-finding are discussed and ways of enabling a better review of police interrogations are examined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-76
Number of pages16
JournalInvestigative Interviewing : Research and Practice
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting on Police Interrogations: Selection effects and bias related to the use of text, video and audiotape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this