TY - JOUR
T1 - Representational hierarchies in social movements
T2 - A case study of the undocumented immigrant youth movement
AU - Fiorito, Tara
AU - Nicholls, Walter J.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - During the late 2010s, the undocumented immigrant youth movement embraced inclusive and intersectional representations. Directly im-pacted activists deconstructed language and symbolic categories that excluded. However, their movement continued to stratify activists along representational lines. This article combines theories of intersectionality and symbolic power to develop the concept of “representational hierarchy.” Producing representations requires legitimacy, and the resources needed for legitimacy (i.e., symbolic capital) are unevenly distributed to activists. Activists in possession of these resources can rise to the top and exert control over the means of representation. Dom-inant activists enforce representations and their positioning through co-ercive (“calling out”) and consensual (“calling in”) mechanisms. Our project employs ethnographic data from two periods of investigation: 2011–12 and 2018. The data include interviews with new and experi-enced activists, analysis of movement documents, and 400 hours of participant observations. For this specific article, we draw mostly on interviews conducted in 2018.
AB - During the late 2010s, the undocumented immigrant youth movement embraced inclusive and intersectional representations. Directly im-pacted activists deconstructed language and symbolic categories that excluded. However, their movement continued to stratify activists along representational lines. This article combines theories of intersectionality and symbolic power to develop the concept of “representational hierarchy.” Producing representations requires legitimacy, and the resources needed for legitimacy (i.e., symbolic capital) are unevenly distributed to activists. Activists in possession of these resources can rise to the top and exert control over the means of representation. Dom-inant activists enforce representations and their positioning through co-ercive (“calling out”) and consensual (“calling in”) mechanisms. Our project employs ethnographic data from two periods of investigation: 2011–12 and 2018. The data include interviews with new and experi-enced activists, analysis of movement documents, and 400 hours of participant observations. For this specific article, we draw mostly on interviews conducted in 2018.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178888486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/726582
DO - 10.1086/726582
M3 - Article
SN - 0002-9602
VL - 129
SP - 485
EP - 529
JO - American Journal of Sociology
JF - American Journal of Sociology
IS - 2
ER -