TY - JOUR
T1 - Research directions in agent communication
AU - Chopra, Amit K.
AU - Artikis, Alexander
AU - Bentahar, Jamal
AU - Colombetti, Marco
AU - Dignum, Frank
AU - Fornara, Nicoletta
AU - Jones, Andrew J. I.
AU - Singh, Munindar P.
AU - Yolum, Pinar
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking. Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions. This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work. © 2013 ACM.
AB - Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking. Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions. This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work. © 2013 ACM.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84873180315
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873180315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2438653.2438655
DO - 10.1145/2438653.2438655
M3 - Article
SN - 2157-6904
VL - 4
JO - ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
JF - ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
IS - 2
M1 - 20
ER -