Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic, or promising?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A striking difference between the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy and its 2003 predecessor is the ubiquity of resilience as a new leitmotif, understood as the ability of states and societies to reform, thus withstanding and recovering from internal and external crisis. Resilience provides a middle ground between over-ambitious liberal peace-building and under-ambitious stability, (re)directs attention to local resources and practices, and is ambiguous enough to be acceptable to everyone. The Global Strategy’s leitmotif is an example of the rise and spread of resilience in international discourses about crisis management and humanitarian emergencies. Although there are risks inherent to the way in which resilience reframes risks and crises, its added value lies in its power as convening concept, opening up international organizations to new ways of thinking and working, and providing a common ground for engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-430
JournalContemporary Security Policy
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date22 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

resilience
pragmatics
EU
International Organizations
value added
peace
reform
discourse
ability
management
society
resources

Cite this

@article{01f470cb0c28449983ced13094944576,
title = "Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic, or promising?",
abstract = "A striking difference between the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy and its 2003 predecessor is the ubiquity of resilience as a new leitmotif, understood as the ability of states and societies to reform, thus withstanding and recovering from internal and external crisis. Resilience provides a middle ground between over-ambitious liberal peace-building and under-ambitious stability, (re)directs attention to local resources and practices, and is ambiguous enough to be acceptable to everyone. The Global Strategy’s leitmotif is an example of the rise and spread of resilience in international discourses about crisis management and humanitarian emergencies. Although there are risks inherent to the way in which resilience reframes risks and crises, its added value lies in its power as convening concept, opening up international organizations to new ways of thinking and working, and providing a common ground for engagement.",
author = "W.M. Wagner and Anholt, {Rosanne Marrit}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "414--430",
journal = "Contemporary Security Policy",
issn = "1352-3260",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic, or promising? / Wagner, W.M.; Anholt, Rosanne Marrit.

In: Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2016, p. 414-430.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic, or promising?

AU - Wagner, W.M.

AU - Anholt, Rosanne Marrit

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - A striking difference between the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy and its 2003 predecessor is the ubiquity of resilience as a new leitmotif, understood as the ability of states and societies to reform, thus withstanding and recovering from internal and external crisis. Resilience provides a middle ground between over-ambitious liberal peace-building and under-ambitious stability, (re)directs attention to local resources and practices, and is ambiguous enough to be acceptable to everyone. The Global Strategy’s leitmotif is an example of the rise and spread of resilience in international discourses about crisis management and humanitarian emergencies. Although there are risks inherent to the way in which resilience reframes risks and crises, its added value lies in its power as convening concept, opening up international organizations to new ways of thinking and working, and providing a common ground for engagement.

AB - A striking difference between the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy and its 2003 predecessor is the ubiquity of resilience as a new leitmotif, understood as the ability of states and societies to reform, thus withstanding and recovering from internal and external crisis. Resilience provides a middle ground between over-ambitious liberal peace-building and under-ambitious stability, (re)directs attention to local resources and practices, and is ambiguous enough to be acceptable to everyone. The Global Strategy’s leitmotif is an example of the rise and spread of resilience in international discourses about crisis management and humanitarian emergencies. Although there are risks inherent to the way in which resilience reframes risks and crises, its added value lies in its power as convening concept, opening up international organizations to new ways of thinking and working, and providing a common ground for engagement.

U2 - 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034

DO - 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 414

EP - 430

JO - Contemporary Security Policy

JF - Contemporary Security Policy

SN - 1352-3260

IS - 3

ER -