Responding to free movement: quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states

Dion Kramer, Jessica Sampson Thierry, Franca van Hooren

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is often held that free movement within the European Union and the expansion of social rights of mobile citizens by the European Court of Justice place national welfare states under pressure, potentially leading to welfare retrenchment. Yet thorough empirical investigation of this claim has been surprisingly limited. In this article, we distinguish three possible responses to such pressures: ‘embedding’, the inclusion of Union citizens in the welfare system; ‘quarantining’, restrictive measures excluding mobile Union citizens; and ‘retrenchment’, general cutbacks in benefit programmes. Through a longitudinal comparative case study of generous non-contributory welfare benefits in Denmark and the Netherlands, we find general welfare retrenchment in response to Europeanisation strikingly limited. Instead, welfare states remain resilient by creatively quarantining mobile Union citizens from the coverage of social benefits. Legal cultures and degrees of politicization are important factors, shaping the pathways towards these creative but exclusionary responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1501-1521
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume25
Issue number10
Early online date28 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

welfare state
welfare
citizen
European Court of Justice
social rights
social benefits
Europeanization
politicization
Denmark
Netherlands
coverage
inclusion

Bibliographical note

Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union

Keywords

  • Europeanisation
  • free movement
  • quarantining
  • resilience
  • retrenchment
  • welfare state

Cite this

Kramer, Dion ; Sampson Thierry, Jessica ; van Hooren, Franca. / Responding to free movement : quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 1501-1521.
@article{a79292f02a7e4ed1a9700587eacf32c8,
title = "Responding to free movement: quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states",
abstract = "It is often held that free movement within the European Union and the expansion of social rights of mobile citizens by the European Court of Justice place national welfare states under pressure, potentially leading to welfare retrenchment. Yet thorough empirical investigation of this claim has been surprisingly limited. In this article, we distinguish three possible responses to such pressures: ‘embedding’, the inclusion of Union citizens in the welfare system; ‘quarantining’, restrictive measures excluding mobile Union citizens; and ‘retrenchment’, general cutbacks in benefit programmes. Through a longitudinal comparative case study of generous non-contributory welfare benefits in Denmark and the Netherlands, we find general welfare retrenchment in response to Europeanisation strikingly limited. Instead, welfare states remain resilient by creatively quarantining mobile Union citizens from the coverage of social benefits. Legal cultures and degrees of politicization are important factors, shaping the pathways towards these creative but exclusionary responses.",
keywords = "Europeanisation, free movement, quarantining, resilience, retrenchment, welfare state",
author = "Dion Kramer and {Sampson Thierry}, Jessica and {van Hooren}, Franca",
note = "Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1501--1521",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Responding to free movement : quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. / Kramer, Dion; Sampson Thierry, Jessica; van Hooren, Franca.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 10, 03.10.2018, p. 1501-1521.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding to free movement

T2 - quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states

AU - Kramer, Dion

AU - Sampson Thierry, Jessica

AU - van Hooren, Franca

N1 - Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - It is often held that free movement within the European Union and the expansion of social rights of mobile citizens by the European Court of Justice place national welfare states under pressure, potentially leading to welfare retrenchment. Yet thorough empirical investigation of this claim has been surprisingly limited. In this article, we distinguish three possible responses to such pressures: ‘embedding’, the inclusion of Union citizens in the welfare system; ‘quarantining’, restrictive measures excluding mobile Union citizens; and ‘retrenchment’, general cutbacks in benefit programmes. Through a longitudinal comparative case study of generous non-contributory welfare benefits in Denmark and the Netherlands, we find general welfare retrenchment in response to Europeanisation strikingly limited. Instead, welfare states remain resilient by creatively quarantining mobile Union citizens from the coverage of social benefits. Legal cultures and degrees of politicization are important factors, shaping the pathways towards these creative but exclusionary responses.

AB - It is often held that free movement within the European Union and the expansion of social rights of mobile citizens by the European Court of Justice place national welfare states under pressure, potentially leading to welfare retrenchment. Yet thorough empirical investigation of this claim has been surprisingly limited. In this article, we distinguish three possible responses to such pressures: ‘embedding’, the inclusion of Union citizens in the welfare system; ‘quarantining’, restrictive measures excluding mobile Union citizens; and ‘retrenchment’, general cutbacks in benefit programmes. Through a longitudinal comparative case study of generous non-contributory welfare benefits in Denmark and the Netherlands, we find general welfare retrenchment in response to Europeanisation strikingly limited. Instead, welfare states remain resilient by creatively quarantining mobile Union citizens from the coverage of social benefits. Legal cultures and degrees of politicization are important factors, shaping the pathways towards these creative but exclusionary responses.

KW - Europeanisation

KW - free movement

KW - quarantining

KW - resilience

KW - retrenchment

KW - welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049138941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049138941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1501

EP - 1521

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 10

ER -