Responding to free movement: quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states

Dion Kramer, Jessica Sampson Thierry, Franca van Hooren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is often held that free movement within the European Union and the expansion of social rights of mobile citizens by the European Court of Justice place national welfare states under pressure, potentially leading to welfare retrenchment. Yet thorough empirical investigation of this claim has been surprisingly limited. In this article, we distinguish three possible responses to such pressures: ‘embedding’, the inclusion of Union citizens in the welfare system; ‘quarantining’, restrictive measures excluding mobile Union citizens; and ‘retrenchment’, general cutbacks in benefit programmes. Through a longitudinal comparative case study of generous non-contributory welfare benefits in Denmark and the Netherlands, we find general welfare retrenchment in response to Europeanisation strikingly limited. Instead, welfare states remain resilient by creatively quarantining mobile Union citizens from the coverage of social benefits. Legal cultures and degrees of politicization are important factors, shaping the pathways towards these creative but exclusionary responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1501-1521
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume25
Issue number10
Early online date28 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2018

Bibliographical note

Special Issue: Free movement and non-discrimination in an unequal Union

Keywords

  • Europeanisation
  • free movement
  • quarantining
  • resilience
  • retrenchment
  • welfare state

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to free movement: quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this