Responses of schools to accountability systems using multiple measures: The case of New York City elementary schools

M. C.M. Ehren, T. Hatch

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many studies point to potential unintended consequences of accountability systems such as when schools narrow their teaching to fixate on tested subjects. As a result, some states and districts in the USA have complemented the federal test-based accountability system with additional measures of educational practices to hold schools accountable on multiple measures. To explore the consequences of such systems, this study focuses on the responses of nine elementary schools to a multiple-measure accountability system in New York City, including high-stakes tests and quality reviews. While some schools showed broader improvement efforts, results suggest the state test remains the dominant measure in driving responses of schools, and in some cases, the quality review further reinforces the schools' focus on the test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-373
Number of pages33
JournalEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Educational accountability
  • High-stakes testing
  • Quality reviews

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Responses of schools to accountability systems using multiple measures: The case of New York City elementary schools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this