Responsibility Voids

Matthew Braham, Martin Van Hees

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract We present evidence for the existence of ‘responsibility voids’ in committee decision-making, that is, the existence of situations where no member of a committee can individually be held morally responsible for the outcome. We analyse three types of reasons (causal, normative and epistemic) for the emergence of responsibility voids, and show that each of them can occur in committees. But the conditions for these voids are so restrictive as to reduce the philosophical or institutional significance they might be thought to possess.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-15
Number of pages10
JournalPhilosophical Quarterly
Volume61
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Responsibility
Voids
Decision Making
Causal

Cite this

Braham, Matthew ; Van Hees, Martin. / Responsibility Voids. In: Philosophical Quarterly. 2011 ; Vol. 61. pp. 6-15.
@article{ad10b68ee3e7493e8860471e70ed4ca3,
title = "Responsibility Voids",
abstract = "Abstract We present evidence for the existence of ‘responsibility voids’ in committee decision-making, that is, the existence of situations where no member of a committee can individually be held morally responsible for the outcome. We analyse three types of reasons (causal, normative and epistemic) for the emergence of responsibility voids, and show that each of them can occur in committees. But the conditions for these voids are so restrictive as to reduce the philosophical or institutional significance they might be thought to possess.",
author = "Matthew Braham and {Van Hees}, Martin",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.677.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "6--15",
journal = "Philosophical Quarterly",
issn = "0031-8094",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Responsibility Voids. / Braham, Matthew; Van Hees, Martin.

In: Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 61, 01.2011, p. 6-15.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsibility Voids

AU - Braham, Matthew

AU - Van Hees, Martin

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Abstract We present evidence for the existence of ‘responsibility voids’ in committee decision-making, that is, the existence of situations where no member of a committee can individually be held morally responsible for the outcome. We analyse three types of reasons (causal, normative and epistemic) for the emergence of responsibility voids, and show that each of them can occur in committees. But the conditions for these voids are so restrictive as to reduce the philosophical or institutional significance they might be thought to possess.

AB - Abstract We present evidence for the existence of ‘responsibility voids’ in committee decision-making, that is, the existence of situations where no member of a committee can individually be held morally responsible for the outcome. We analyse three types of reasons (causal, normative and epistemic) for the emergence of responsibility voids, and show that each of them can occur in committees. But the conditions for these voids are so restrictive as to reduce the philosophical or institutional significance they might be thought to possess.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.677.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.677.x

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 6

EP - 15

JO - Philosophical Quarterly

JF - Philosophical Quarterly

SN - 0031-8094

ER -