Abstract
To survey the conformity and quality of results among laboratories for microplastics determination worldwide, an international laboratory intercomparison and development exercise was organized. The 34 participants were requested to determine the polymer type and number or mass of polymer particles in 12 samples, i.e. six samples containing of pre-production pellets, five dissolvable soda tablets containing different (smaller) polymer particles and one blank soda tablet. A novel method for providing the test materials in aluminium strips was used. Thirty laboratories (88%) submitted data using their own method of choice, resulting in a variety of identification and quantification methods (n = 7). The majority of the labs (53–100%) correctly identified the type of polymer in all samples but one. The performance of the laboratories in quantifying and weighing the pellets was very good. The analysis of the number of the particles in the soda tablets varied considerably between laboratories (29–91%). The results of this study highlight the complexity of microplastics analysis and the need for harmonization of both reporting format and methods. Continued development and assessment of the comparability among analytical methods and laboratories are urgently needed to support monitoring programmes, research and decision-making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 145071 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 772 |
Early online date | 4 Feb 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors would like to thank all participants for their contribution to the ILS. The authors also gratefully acknowledge Svetlana Pakhomova, Guyu Peng and Rachel Hurley for the production and the QA/QC of the soda tablet samples. NORMAN is acknowledged for distributing invitations to participate in the ILS. This research was partly funded by contributions of the participants, but did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Analysis
- Laboratory comparability
- Polymer
- Quality assurance (QAQC)
- Quality control