Retraction Note: New land-use-change emissions indicate a declining CO2 airborne fraction

Margreet J.E. van Marle, Dave van Wees, Richard A. Houghton, Robert D. Field, Jan Verbesselt, Guido R. van der Werf*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalErratum / CorrigendumAcademic

Abstract

Retraction to: Nature Published online 16 March 2022 The Matters Arising paper by Bennedsen et al.1 has revealed flaws in the Monte Carlo setup we used to assess the significance of the trend in the CO2 airborne fraction. In our paper we showed that this trend becomes negative if we use our new findings on emissions from land use and land use change to construct the airborne fraction. We acknowledge that the statistical approach needs to be corrected and therefore accept a retraction as requested by the editor. We have recently revised our statistical approach, which was done in close collaboration with the authors of the Matters Arising paper. Our results have become more robust and we will re-submit these solidified findings in a corrected paper.

Original languageEnglish
Article number202
Number of pages1
JournalNature
Volume622
Issue number7981
Early online date18 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Retraction Note: New land-use-change emissions indicate a declining CO2 airborne fraction (Nature, (2022), 603, 7901, (450-454), DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04376-4).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retraction Note: New land-use-change emissions indicate a declining CO2 airborne fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this