TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of the effectiveness of smallholder farmers’ adaptation to climate change and variability in developing countries
AU - Etana, Dula
AU - Snelder, Denyse J.R.M.
AU - van Wesenbeeck, Cornelia F.A.
AU - de Cock Buning, Tjard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Newcastle University.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of adaptation. We reviewed and thematically synthesized 42 household-level studies published from 2000–2019 to explain how multiple processes interact to affect the effectiveness of adaptation. The findings show the positive impacts of adaptation in increasing crop yields and income, improving food security, and enhancing environmental protection. Not all adaptation strategies are effective, due partly to differences in sensitivity to climate problems, access to livelihood assets, diversification of adaptation strategies, and flexibility and cultural relevance of institutional support. For households with lower adaptive capacity, limited adaptation choices and reliance on climate-sensitive strategies fail to unshackle them from cyclical vulnerability. Improving adaptive capacity and facilitating diversified adaptation strategies are important to address the livelihood challenges of smallholder farmers. Understanding the complexities underlying the effectiveness of adaptation necessitates evaluation focusing on multidimensional livelihood outcomes to disentangle implications for sustainable livelihoods and socio-ecological resilience.
AB - The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of adaptation. We reviewed and thematically synthesized 42 household-level studies published from 2000–2019 to explain how multiple processes interact to affect the effectiveness of adaptation. The findings show the positive impacts of adaptation in increasing crop yields and income, improving food security, and enhancing environmental protection. Not all adaptation strategies are effective, due partly to differences in sensitivity to climate problems, access to livelihood assets, diversification of adaptation strategies, and flexibility and cultural relevance of institutional support. For households with lower adaptive capacity, limited adaptation choices and reliance on climate-sensitive strategies fail to unshackle them from cyclical vulnerability. Improving adaptive capacity and facilitating diversified adaptation strategies are important to address the livelihood challenges of smallholder farmers. Understanding the complexities underlying the effectiveness of adaptation necessitates evaluation focusing on multidimensional livelihood outcomes to disentangle implications for sustainable livelihoods and socio-ecological resilience.
KW - adaptive capacity
KW - impact assessment
KW - livelihood
KW - resilience
KW - vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106517273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106517273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2021.1905620
DO - 10.1080/09640568.2021.1905620
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85106517273
SN - 0964-0568
VL - 65
SP - 759
EP - 784
JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
IS - 5
ER -