Abstract
For the purpose of chemical risk management and decision-making, chemical risk assessment (RA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) of products are indispensable tools. In this paper the authors provide an overview of their respective modes of application, based on the goals for which they have been designed, and the underlying modelling structures. LCA is shown to differ in a fundamental way from RA, offering distinctive possibilities for serving management and policy goals. The functional unit plays a key role, both in the capacities of LCA and in how LCA differs from RA. Despite these differences, the authors conclude the paper with a proposal for the integration of RA and LCA into a common tool that combines them without the loss of their individual advantages.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-87 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Greener Management International |
| Issue number | 41 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Contribution to risks
- Environmental decision-making
- Environmental management
- EUSES
- Functional unit
- Life-cycle assessment
- Risk assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Risk assessment and life-cycle assessment: Fundamentally different yet reconcilable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver