Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines)

D. J. Snelder, M. D. Masipiqueña, G. R. de Snoo

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A significant increase in pesticide use has increased concerns about potentially adverse effects on human health and the environment, particularly in countries where regulations are not strictly implemented and farmers' knowledge of safe handling procedures is often inadequate. This paper assesses the potential risk of pesticide use by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley, North-East Luzon, the Philippines, by examining pesticide usage, application methods, pesticide drift and health effects among farmers with different levels of income and market access. About 104 farmers growing rice and corn were interviewed and spray drift and exposure of operators was measured when 22 rice farmers sprayed with water using their knapsack equipment. Twenty different pesticides freely sold in stores or markets were encountered in the study, 9 of which are classified as 'highly hazardous' or 'moderately hazardous' and at least 6 as restricted use pesticides. Farmers mostly at risk had the highest income and largest farms. By walking through crops, farmers' legs were most seriously exposed to pesticide deposition. The experimental results agreed with farmers' affirmative response to questions about their suffering various symptoms of poisoning. Estimates of pesticide concentrations in watercourses exposed to drift suggest that aquatic species will suffer adverse effects up to at least 2.0 m from field borders. Hazard quotients suggest that pesticide application rates are not toxic to honeybees exposed to drift up to 1.5 m from sprayed fields. Approval of pesticides needs to distinguish between restricted and general use pesticides. Recommendations are made for controlling pesticide use and its impacts, modifying the integrated pest management programme and redesigning pesticide policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747-762
Number of pages16
JournalCrop Protection
Volume27
Issue number3-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Philippines
risk assessment
pesticides
valleys
farmers
spray drift
income
adverse effects
market access
rice
large farms
integrated pest management
application methods
walking
application rate
signs and symptoms (plants)
pesticide application
honey bees
human health
poisoning

Keywords

  • Developing countries
  • Environmental effects
  • Health effects
  • Knapsack spray experiments

Cite this

Snelder, D. J. ; Masipiqueña, M. D. ; de Snoo, G. R. / Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines). In: Crop Protection. 2008 ; Vol. 27, No. 3-5. pp. 747-762.
@article{3765dca8a67a450595dddb84e2c02861,
title = "Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines)",
abstract = "A significant increase in pesticide use has increased concerns about potentially adverse effects on human health and the environment, particularly in countries where regulations are not strictly implemented and farmers' knowledge of safe handling procedures is often inadequate. This paper assesses the potential risk of pesticide use by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley, North-East Luzon, the Philippines, by examining pesticide usage, application methods, pesticide drift and health effects among farmers with different levels of income and market access. About 104 farmers growing rice and corn were interviewed and spray drift and exposure of operators was measured when 22 rice farmers sprayed with water using their knapsack equipment. Twenty different pesticides freely sold in stores or markets were encountered in the study, 9 of which are classified as 'highly hazardous' or 'moderately hazardous' and at least 6 as restricted use pesticides. Farmers mostly at risk had the highest income and largest farms. By walking through crops, farmers' legs were most seriously exposed to pesticide deposition. The experimental results agreed with farmers' affirmative response to questions about their suffering various symptoms of poisoning. Estimates of pesticide concentrations in watercourses exposed to drift suggest that aquatic species will suffer adverse effects up to at least 2.0 m from field borders. Hazard quotients suggest that pesticide application rates are not toxic to honeybees exposed to drift up to 1.5 m from sprayed fields. Approval of pesticides needs to distinguish between restricted and general use pesticides. Recommendations are made for controlling pesticide use and its impacts, modifying the integrated pest management programme and redesigning pesticide policies.",
keywords = "Developing countries, Environmental effects, Health effects, Knapsack spray experiments",
author = "Snelder, {D. J.} and Masipique{\~n}a, {M. D.} and {de Snoo}, {G. R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cropro.2007.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "747--762",
journal = "Crop Protection",
issn = "0261-2194",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3-5",

}

Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines). / Snelder, D. J.; Masipiqueña, M. D.; de Snoo, G. R.

In: Crop Protection, Vol. 27, No. 3-5, 01.03.2008, p. 747-762.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk assessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley (Philippines)

AU - Snelder, D. J.

AU - Masipiqueña, M. D.

AU - de Snoo, G. R.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - A significant increase in pesticide use has increased concerns about potentially adverse effects on human health and the environment, particularly in countries where regulations are not strictly implemented and farmers' knowledge of safe handling procedures is often inadequate. This paper assesses the potential risk of pesticide use by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley, North-East Luzon, the Philippines, by examining pesticide usage, application methods, pesticide drift and health effects among farmers with different levels of income and market access. About 104 farmers growing rice and corn were interviewed and spray drift and exposure of operators was measured when 22 rice farmers sprayed with water using their knapsack equipment. Twenty different pesticides freely sold in stores or markets were encountered in the study, 9 of which are classified as 'highly hazardous' or 'moderately hazardous' and at least 6 as restricted use pesticides. Farmers mostly at risk had the highest income and largest farms. By walking through crops, farmers' legs were most seriously exposed to pesticide deposition. The experimental results agreed with farmers' affirmative response to questions about their suffering various symptoms of poisoning. Estimates of pesticide concentrations in watercourses exposed to drift suggest that aquatic species will suffer adverse effects up to at least 2.0 m from field borders. Hazard quotients suggest that pesticide application rates are not toxic to honeybees exposed to drift up to 1.5 m from sprayed fields. Approval of pesticides needs to distinguish between restricted and general use pesticides. Recommendations are made for controlling pesticide use and its impacts, modifying the integrated pest management programme and redesigning pesticide policies.

AB - A significant increase in pesticide use has increased concerns about potentially adverse effects on human health and the environment, particularly in countries where regulations are not strictly implemented and farmers' knowledge of safe handling procedures is often inadequate. This paper assesses the potential risk of pesticide use by smallholder farmers in the Cagayan Valley, North-East Luzon, the Philippines, by examining pesticide usage, application methods, pesticide drift and health effects among farmers with different levels of income and market access. About 104 farmers growing rice and corn were interviewed and spray drift and exposure of operators was measured when 22 rice farmers sprayed with water using their knapsack equipment. Twenty different pesticides freely sold in stores or markets were encountered in the study, 9 of which are classified as 'highly hazardous' or 'moderately hazardous' and at least 6 as restricted use pesticides. Farmers mostly at risk had the highest income and largest farms. By walking through crops, farmers' legs were most seriously exposed to pesticide deposition. The experimental results agreed with farmers' affirmative response to questions about their suffering various symptoms of poisoning. Estimates of pesticide concentrations in watercourses exposed to drift suggest that aquatic species will suffer adverse effects up to at least 2.0 m from field borders. Hazard quotients suggest that pesticide application rates are not toxic to honeybees exposed to drift up to 1.5 m from sprayed fields. Approval of pesticides needs to distinguish between restricted and general use pesticides. Recommendations are made for controlling pesticide use and its impacts, modifying the integrated pest management programme and redesigning pesticide policies.

KW - Developing countries

KW - Environmental effects

KW - Health effects

KW - Knapsack spray experiments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949207471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949207471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.10.011

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 747

EP - 762

JO - Crop Protection

JF - Crop Protection

SN - 0261-2194

IS - 3-5

ER -