Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Roles of Judges, Lawyers and Parties in Fact-Finding in Civil Procedures. Developments in Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademic

Abstract

This contribution elaborates on the findings of a recent comparative research project on developments in the roles of judges, parties, and lawyers in the fact-finding process in Belgian, Dutch, French, and German civil procedural law. In theory, the need for efficiency and growing wish to guarantee certain rights has led these four legal systems to adopt similar measures where the roles of the judge and the parties are concerned: they have expanded both the managerial powers of the judge and the procedural duties of the parties. In practice, however, these measures play out quite differently. However: the views on the role of the lawyer in first instance civil proceedings seem to be shifting in different directions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)39-64
Number of pages26
JournalRevista de Processo
Volume50
Issue number363
Publication statusPublished - May 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Published online: 9 Jul 2025.

Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • fact-finding
  • duty to tell the truth
  • civil procedural law
  • comparative law
  • Judges

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Roles of Judges, Lawyers and Parties in Fact-Finding in Civil Procedures. Developments in Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this