Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Salience, legitimacy and credibility of single-cell sperm data and their evaluation

  • Catherine M. Grgicak
  • , Qhawe Bhembe
  • , Klaas Slooten
  • , Anu Khandelwal
  • , Ken R. Duffy
  • , Desmond S. Lun

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is difficult to determine how many sperm donors contributed to a sample, who they were, or what number of sperm they donated. A model analyzing single-cell electropherograms (scEPG) born of diploid cells was previously introduced in [1]. In this paper we extend the model to handle haploid scEPGs, specifically sperm cells, and consider if single-cell forensics is ready to traverse the research-operations boundary. To do this we use the Salience-Legitimacy-Credibility (SLC) framework. In Salience we identify relevant forensic questions. Legitimacy then has us first describe the logic underpinning our haploid-aware model, and verify it was correctly implemented into EESCIt™. Using 121 individuated scEPGs - i.e., singlets - we show that the mean square error between the prediction and the empirical outcomes given that prediction is no more than 3.1 × 10−5 at any locus, demonstrating excellent model fidelity. LR-discrepancy analysis confirms the relative (empirical) frequency and magnitude of H1- and H2- LRs align with declared values, with the largest discrepancy being 0.3 in WoE - i.e., logLR - interval [1, 2]. Credibility analysis showed that no singlet produced a misdirected WoE and we receive, on average, one WoE for every ∼1200 RFU carried by a haploid. We then evaluate EESCIt™ on 33 sperm mixtures comprising 2-5 donors and find that estimates about the number of donors, the number of scEPGs by a donor, and the WoE remain legitimate. The system continues to credibly discriminate source hypotheses, often producing WoE of 10 when the PoI-true contributes as few as two haploids and values near 25 when 10 haploids are present. WoEs remain stable across mixture complexity with no dependence on the true number of contributors, n, showing a robustness unique to single cell data. Additionally, computational time is only mildly impacted by n, with the main determiner being the number of cells isolated. With a legitimate, credible haploid model able to address multifarious salient questions, we integrate it into EESCIt™, establishing a single-cell assessment system that is now capable of evaluating haploid single-cell data.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103476
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalForensic Science International: Genetics
Volume84
Early online date28 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Funding

This work was partially supported by NIJ2018-DU-BX-0185 and NIJ2020-R2-CX-0032 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice . The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not reflect those of the Department of Justice.

Funders
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
National Institute of Justice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Salience, legitimacy and credibility of single-cell sperm data and their evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this