Salivary Calprotectin is Not a Useful Biomarker to Monitor Disease Activity in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Vincent Bos*, Femke Crouwel, Petra Waaijenberg, Gerd Bouma, Marjolijn Duijvestein, Hans J.C. Buiter, Henk S. Brand, Henrike M. Hamer, Nanne K. de Boer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims: Non-invasive biomarkers are gaining interest for monitoring disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Fecal calprotectin is a reliable biomarker but patients often report the collection of feces being unpleasant and cumbersome. In this study, we aimed to assess if salivary calprotectin could be used as a non-invasive biomarker to determine disease activity instead of fecal calprotectin. Methods: In this cross-sectional explorative cohort study, stimulated saliva was collected from patients with an established IBD diagnosis and healthy controls. The concentration of calprotectin in saliva was determined by a particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay. Intestinal disease activity was assessed with fecal calprotectin levels and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI). Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Results: Sixty-three patients (41 Crohn’s disease and 22 ulcerative colitis) and 11 controls were included. Patients had a mean fecal calprotectin of 138.78 µg/g and a median salivary calprotectin of 1.87 mg/L. No significant correlation was found between salivary calprotectin and fecal calprotectin levels (p=0.495). When patients were stratified in two subgroups based on a fecal calprotectin cut-off value of 250 µg/g, there were no significant differences in salivary calprotectin levels between both patient groups (p=0.641) and between patients and healthy controls (p=0.248). Also, salivary, and fecal calprotectin levels were not significantly different when stratifying patients in two subgroups, active disease and remission, using HBI/SCCAI scores. Conclusions: Salivary calprotectin does not correlate to fecal calprotectin and disease activity scores in patients, making it unreliable for assessing IBD activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-289
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: G.B. has received consultancy fees from Roche and Takeda. M.D. received advisory fees from Echo Pharma and Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc., speaker fees from Janssen, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma, and nonfinancial support from Dr. Falk Pharm. N.K.d.B. has served as a speaker for AbbVie and MSD and has served as consultant and principal investigator for TEVA Pharma BV and Takeda. He has received a (unrestricted) research grant from Dr. Falk, TEVA Pharma BV, MLDS and Takeda. For the remaining authors no conflict of interest was declared.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Romanian Society of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • biomarker
  • calprotectin
  • Crohn’s disease
  • disease activity
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • saliva
  • ulcerative colitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Salivary Calprotectin is Not a Useful Biomarker to Monitor Disease Activity in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this