Salivary microbiome profiles of oral cancer patients analyzed before and after treatment

Anna I. Mäkinen*, Vincent Y. Pappalardo, Mark J. Buijs, Bernd W. Brandt, Antti A. Mäkitie, Jukka H. Meurman, Egija Zaura

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treating oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) introduces new ecological environments in the oral cavity. This is expected to cause changes in the oral microbiome. The purpose of this study was to gain new information on the salivary microbiome of OSCC patients in order to improve the aftercare of OSCC patients. The aims of this study were to investigate possible changes in the salivary microbiome profiles of OSCC patients before and after cancer treatment and to compare these changes with the profiles of healthy controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin-stimulated whole saliva samples were collected, and the salivary flow rate was measured from 99 OSCC patients prior to surgical resection of the tumor and other adjuvant therapy. After treatment, 28 OSCC patients were re-examined with a mean follow-up time of 48 months. In addition, 101 healthy controls were examined and sampled. After DNA extraction and purification, the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The merged read pairs were denoised using UNOISE3, mapped to zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs), and the representative zOTU sequences were assigned a taxonomy using HOMD. Descriptive statistics were used to study the differences in the microbial profiles of OSCC patients before and after treatment and in comparison to healthy controls.

RESULTS: At baseline, the OSCC patients showed a higher relative abundance of zOTUs classified as Streptococcus anginosus, Abiotrophia defectiva, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. The microbial profiles differed significantly between OSCC patients and healthy controls (F = 5.9, p < 0.001). Alpha diversity of the salivary microbiome of OSCC patients was decreased at the follow-up, and the microbial profiles differed significantly from the pre-treatment (p < 0.001) and from that of healthy controls (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: OSCC patients' salivary microbiome profile had a higher abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria compared to healthy controls. Treatment of the OSCC caused a significant decrease in alpha diversity and increase in variability of the salivary microbiome, which was still evident after several years of follow-up. OSCC patients may benefit from preventive measures, such as the use of pre- or probiotics, salivary substitutes, or dietary counseling. Video Abstract.

Original languageEnglish
Article number171
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalMicrobiome
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki. This work was supported by research grants from the Helsinki University Hospital [Y1014SL006], the Finnish Dental Society Apollonia, the Finnish Medical Society, the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, and the King Gustav V and Queen Victoria’s Freemason’s Foundation. The funding sources had no involvement in the study design; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation or submission of this article.

FundersFunder number
King Gustav V and Queen Victoria’s Freemason’s Foundation
Helsingin ja Uudenmaan SairaanhoitopiiriY1014SL006
Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
Finska Läkaresällskapet
Suomen Hammaslääkäriseura Apollonia
Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse
Suomen Tiedeseura

    Keywords

    • Humans
    • Mouth Neoplasms/therapy
    • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy
    • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
    • Saliva/microbiology
    • Microbiota/genetics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Salivary microbiome profiles of oral cancer patients analyzed before and after treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this