Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Scalability of digital psychological innovations for refugees: A comparative analysis in Egypt, Germany, and Sweden

  • Aniek Woodward*
  • , Sebastian Burchert
  • , Alexandra S. Barry
  • , Jacqueline E.W. Broerse
  • , Egbert Sondorp
  • , Anoushka Bold
  • , Alexander Ruberl
  • , Jonas M. Hessling
  • , Christine Knaevelsrud
  • , Bayard Roberts
  • , Daniela C. Fuhr
  • , Peter Ventevogel
  • , Nadine Hosny
  • , Tomas Lindegaard
  • , Shervin Shahnavaz
  • , Marit Sijbrandij
  • , Pim Cuijpers
  • , Martin McKee
  • , Marjolein A. Dieleman
  • , STRENGTHS-consortium
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

E-mental health interventions may offer innovative means to increase access to psychological support and improve the mental health of refugees. However, there is limited knowledge about how these innovations can be scaled up and integrated sustainably into routine services. This study examined the scalability of a digital psychological intervention called Step-by-Step (SbS) for refugees in Egypt, Germany, and Sweden. We conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 88) with Syrian refugees, and experts in SbS or refugee' mental health systems in the three countries. Data collection and analysis were guided by a system innovation perspective. Interviewees identified three contextual factors that influenced scalability of SbS in each country: increasing use of e-health, the COVID-19 pandemic, and political instability. Nine factors lay at the interface between the innovation and potential delivery systems, and these were categorised by culture (ways of thinking), structure (ways of organising), and practice (ways of doing). Factors related to culture included: perceived need and acceptability of the innovation. Acceptability was influenced by mental health stigma and awareness, digital trust, perceived novelty of self-help interventions, and attitudes towards non-specialist (e-helper) support. Factors related to structure included financing, regulations, accessibility, competencies of e-helpers, and quality control. Factors related to practice were barriers in the initial and continued engagement of end-users. Many actors with a potential stake in the integration of SbS across the three countries were identified, with nineteen stakeholders deemed most powerful. Several context-specific integration scenarios were developed, which need to be tested. We conclude that integrating novel e-mental health interventions for refugees into routine services will be a complex task due to the many interrelated factors and actors involved. Multi-stakeholder collaboration, including the involvement of end-users, will be essential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100231
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalSSM - Mental Health
Volume4
Early online date14 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme Societal Challenges under grant agreement No 733337. The content of this article reflects only the authors' views and not necessarily those of the organisations they serve or of the European Union. The European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme Societal Challenges under grant agreement No 733337 . The content of this article reflects only the authors' views and not necessarily those of the organisations they serve or of the European Union. The European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

FundersFunder number
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Societal Challenges
European Commission
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme733337

    Keywords

    • e-mental health
    • Egypt
    • Germany
    • Scalability
    • Step-by-Step
    • Sweden
    • Syrian refugees
    • Systems perspective

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Scalability of digital psychological innovations for refugees: A comparative analysis in Egypt, Germany, and Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this