Scaling up social enterprise: Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective

Heidi Dahles, Michiel Verver, Sothy Khieng, Ireen Manders, Nite Schellens

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on the intricate nature of scaling practices in social enterprise organizations (SEOs). The research is based on case study methodology in two different institutional environments, the Netherlands and Cambodia. Comparing and contrasting these cases, the article raises questions about ways in which the institutional environments affect scaling practices. Whilst Dutch and Cambodian SEOs upscale to address market deficiencies in dissimilar institutional environments, the dominant strategy in both cases is to scale for depth impact. Under neoliberal market logic, both institutional environments converge in creating obstacles for SEOs to fully develop their entrepreneurial potential and contribute to social innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Social Entrepreneurship
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

scaling
Cambodia
market
Netherlands
innovation
methodology

Keywords

  • Scaling up social enterprise
  • scaling strategies
  • scaling social impact
  • upscaling–deepscaling
  • institutional environment

Cite this

Dahles, Heidi ; Verver, Michiel ; Khieng, Sothy ; Manders, Ireen ; Schellens, Nite. / Scaling up social enterprise : Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective. In: Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2019 ; pp. 1-26.
@article{6f4d48a349dd47a592b67a5429219f60,
title = "Scaling up social enterprise: Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective",
abstract = "This article focuses on the intricate nature of scaling practices in social enterprise organizations (SEOs). The research is based on case study methodology in two different institutional environments, the Netherlands and Cambodia. Comparing and contrasting these cases, the article raises questions about ways in which the institutional environments affect scaling practices. Whilst Dutch and Cambodian SEOs upscale to address market deficiencies in dissimilar institutional environments, the dominant strategy in both cases is to scale for depth impact. Under neoliberal market logic, both institutional environments converge in creating obstacles for SEOs to fully develop their entrepreneurial potential and contribute to social innovation.",
keywords = "Scaling up social enterprise, scaling strategies, scaling social impact, upscaling–deepscaling, institutional environment",
author = "Heidi Dahles and Michiel Verver and Sothy Khieng and Ireen Manders and Nite Schellens",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/19420676.2019.1641136",
language = "English",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Journal of Social Entrepreneurship",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Scaling up social enterprise : Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective. / Dahles, Heidi; Verver, Michiel; Khieng, Sothy; Manders, Ireen ; Schellens, Nite.

In: Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2019, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaling up social enterprise

T2 - Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective

AU - Dahles, Heidi

AU - Verver, Michiel

AU - Khieng, Sothy

AU - Manders, Ireen

AU - Schellens, Nite

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article focuses on the intricate nature of scaling practices in social enterprise organizations (SEOs). The research is based on case study methodology in two different institutional environments, the Netherlands and Cambodia. Comparing and contrasting these cases, the article raises questions about ways in which the institutional environments affect scaling practices. Whilst Dutch and Cambodian SEOs upscale to address market deficiencies in dissimilar institutional environments, the dominant strategy in both cases is to scale for depth impact. Under neoliberal market logic, both institutional environments converge in creating obstacles for SEOs to fully develop their entrepreneurial potential and contribute to social innovation.

AB - This article focuses on the intricate nature of scaling practices in social enterprise organizations (SEOs). The research is based on case study methodology in two different institutional environments, the Netherlands and Cambodia. Comparing and contrasting these cases, the article raises questions about ways in which the institutional environments affect scaling practices. Whilst Dutch and Cambodian SEOs upscale to address market deficiencies in dissimilar institutional environments, the dominant strategy in both cases is to scale for depth impact. Under neoliberal market logic, both institutional environments converge in creating obstacles for SEOs to fully develop their entrepreneurial potential and contribute to social innovation.

KW - Scaling up social enterprise

KW - scaling strategies

KW - scaling social impact

KW - upscaling–deepscaling

KW - institutional environment

U2 - 10.1080/19420676.2019.1641136

DO - 10.1080/19420676.2019.1641136

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

JF - Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

ER -