Science-policy processes for transboundary water governance

D. Armitage, R. de Loe, M. Morris, T. Edwards, A. Gerlak, R. Hall, D. Huitema, R. Ison, D. Livingstone, G. Macdonald, N. Mirumachi, R. Plummer, B. Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this policy perspective, we outline several conditions to support effective science–policy interaction, with a particular emphasis on improving water governance in transboundary basins. Key conditions include (1) recognizing that science is a crucial but bounded input into water resource decision-making processes; (2) establishing conditions for collaboration and shared commitment among actors; (3) understanding that social or group-learning processes linked to science–policy interaction are enhanced through greater collaboration; (4) accepting that the collaborative production of knowledge about hydrological issues and associated socioeconomic change and institutional responses is essential to build legitimate decision-making processes; and (5) engaging boundary organizations and informal networks of scientists, policy makers, and civil society. We elaborate on these conditions with a diverse set of international examples drawn from a synthesis of our collective experiences in assessing the opportunities and constraints (including the role of power relations) related to governance for water in transboundary settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-366
JournalAMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science-policy processes for transboundary water governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this