Scientism: Prospects and Problems

Jeroen de Ridder (Editor), Rik Peels (Editor), René van Woudenberg* (Editor)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book / ReportBook editingAcademic

Abstract

Can only science deliver genuine knowledge about the world and ourselves? Is science our only guide to what exists? Adherents of scientism tend to answer both questions with yes. Scientism is increasingly influential in popular scientific literature and intellectual life in general, but philosophers have hitherto largely ignored it. This collection is one of the first to develop and assess scientism as a serious philosophical position. It features twelve new essays by both proponents and critics of scientism. Before scientism can be evaluated, it needs to be clear what it is. Hence, the collection opens with essays that provide an overview of the many different versions of scientism and their mutual interrelations. Next, several card-carrying proponents of scientism make their case, either by developing and arguing directly for their preferred version of scientism or by responding to objections. Then, the floor is given to critics of scientism. It is examined whether scientism is epistemically vicious, whether scientism presents a plausible general epistemological outlook, and whether science has limits. The final four essays zoom out and connect scientism to ongoing debates elsewhere in philosophy. What does scientism mean for religious epistemology? What can science tell us about morality and is a scientistic moral epistemology plausible? How is scientism related to physicalism?

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University press
Number of pages304
ISBN (Electronic)9780190462765, 9780190462772
ISBN (Print)9780190462758
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Common Sense
  • Epistemology
  • Limits of Science
  • Physicalism
  • Scientism
  • Stance

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Scientism: Prospects and Problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this