Abstract
Background: Early detection of vulnerable older adults at the emergency department (ED) and implementation of targeted interventions to prevent functional decline may lead to better patient outcomes. Objective: To assess the level of agreement between four frequently used screening instruments: ISAR-HP, VMS, InterRAI ED Screener and APOP. Methods: Observational prospective cohort study in patients ≥ 70 years attending Dutch ED. Results: The prevalence of vulnerability ranged from 19% (APOP) to 45% (ISAR-HP). Overall there was a moderate agreement between the screening instruments (Fleiss Kappa of 0.42 (p<0.001)). Conclusion: Depending on the screening instrument used, either only a small percentage or almost as many as half of the presenting patients will be eligible for targeted interventions, leading to large dissimilarities in working processes, resources and costs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 124-129 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Acute medicine |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2018 |
Funding
We would like to thank the Emergency Department and Department of Internal Medicine, at both VU University Medical Center and Amstelland Hospital, for their support.
| Funders |
|---|
| Hallym University Medical Center |
Keywords
- APOP
- Emergency department
- InterRAI ED screener
- ISAR-HP
- Older adults
- Screening
- VMS
- Vulnerability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Screening instruments for identification of vulnerable older adults at the emergency department: A critical appraisal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver