Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size

Piet Rietveld, Stefan van Woudenberg

Research output: Working paperProfessional

Abstract

Railway networks are characterised by variations in demand on different links. Optimal strategies therefore call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper we investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures, uniform price elasticities, uniform demand levels across the day, but with demand levels that vary across segments of the network. We demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Welfare losses due to making vehicle size and price per km uniform across links are smaller. We further find that when capacity, represented by frequency and vehicle size, is set at its optimal level at the various network segments, the contribution of price differentiation to social welfare is very limited. These results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues like congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size and in particular frequences are the preferred way of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherTinbergen Instituut
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameDiscussion paper TI
No.07-007/3

Fingerprint

Operator
Railway
Decision making
Welfare loss
Uniform price
Cost structure
Optimal strategy
Social welfare
Asymmetry
Congestion
Price elasticity

Cite this

Rietveld, P., & van Woudenberg, S. (2007). Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size. (Discussion paper TI; No. 07-007/3). Amsterdam: Tinbergen Instituut.
Rietveld, Piet ; van Woudenberg, Stefan. / Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size. Amsterdam : Tinbergen Instituut, 2007. (Discussion paper TI; 07-007/3).
@techreport{32fbc38543f84ac7ae2405f904610df8,
title = "Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size",
abstract = "Railway networks are characterised by variations in demand on different links. Optimal strategies therefore call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper we investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures, uniform price elasticities, uniform demand levels across the day, but with demand levels that vary across segments of the network. We demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Welfare losses due to making vehicle size and price per km uniform across links are smaller. We further find that when capacity, represented by frequency and vehicle size, is set at its optimal level at the various network segments, the contribution of price differentiation to social welfare is very limited. These results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues like congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size and in particular frequences are the preferred way of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.",
author = "Piet Rietveld and {van Woudenberg}, Stefan",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "Discussion paper TI",
publisher = "Tinbergen Instituut",
number = "07-007/3",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Tinbergen Instituut",

}

Rietveld, P & van Woudenberg, S 2007 'Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size' Discussion paper TI, no. 07-007/3, Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam.

Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size. / Rietveld, Piet; van Woudenberg, Stefan.

Amsterdam : Tinbergen Instituut, 2007. (Discussion paper TI; No. 07-007/3).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size

AU - Rietveld, Piet

AU - van Woudenberg, Stefan

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Railway networks are characterised by variations in demand on different links. Optimal strategies therefore call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper we investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures, uniform price elasticities, uniform demand levels across the day, but with demand levels that vary across segments of the network. We demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Welfare losses due to making vehicle size and price per km uniform across links are smaller. We further find that when capacity, represented by frequency and vehicle size, is set at its optimal level at the various network segments, the contribution of price differentiation to social welfare is very limited. These results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues like congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size and in particular frequences are the preferred way of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.

AB - Railway networks are characterised by variations in demand on different links. Optimal strategies therefore call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper we investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures, uniform price elasticities, uniform demand levels across the day, but with demand levels that vary across segments of the network. We demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Welfare losses due to making vehicle size and price per km uniform across links are smaller. We further find that when capacity, represented by frequency and vehicle size, is set at its optimal level at the various network segments, the contribution of price differentiation to social welfare is very limited. These results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues like congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size and in particular frequences are the preferred way of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Discussion paper TI

BT - Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size

PB - Tinbergen Instituut

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

Rietveld P, van Woudenberg S. Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Instituut. 2007. (Discussion paper TI; 07-007/3).