Sectoral energy- and labour-productivity convergence

Research output: Working paperProfessional

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the development of cross-country differences in energy- and labour productivity. The analysis is performed at a detailed sectoral level for 14 OECD countries, covering the period 1970-1997. A σ-convergence analysis reveals that the development over time of the cross-country variation in productivity performance differs across sectors as well as across different levels of aggregation. Both patterns of convergence as well as divergence are found. Cross-country variation of productivity levels is typically larger for energy than for labour. A β-convergence analysis provides support for the hypothesis that in most sectors lagging countries tend to catch up with technological leaders, in particular in terms of energy productivity. Moreover, the results show that convergence is conditional, meaning that productivity levels converge to country-specific steady states. Energy prices and wages are shown to positively affect energy- and labour-productivity growth, respectively. We also find evidence for the importance of economies of scale, whereas the investment share, openness and specialization play only a modest role in explaining cross-country variation in energy- and labour-productivity growth. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationDen Haag
PublisherCPB
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Publication series

NameCPB Discussion Paper

Fingerprint

Labour productivity
Energy productivity
Productivity
Productivity growth
Openness
Divergence
Country differences
Wages
Labor
Energy prices
Catch-up
Economies of scale
OECD countries
Energy

Cite this

@techreport{ef6c8b45544148c6aa3db1f0cca37f5c,
title = "Sectoral energy- and labour-productivity convergence",
abstract = "This paper empirically investigates the development of cross-country differences in energy- and labour productivity. The analysis is performed at a detailed sectoral level for 14 OECD countries, covering the period 1970-1997. A σ-convergence analysis reveals that the development over time of the cross-country variation in productivity performance differs across sectors as well as across different levels of aggregation. Both patterns of convergence as well as divergence are found. Cross-country variation of productivity levels is typically larger for energy than for labour. A β-convergence analysis provides support for the hypothesis that in most sectors lagging countries tend to catch up with technological leaders, in particular in terms of energy productivity. Moreover, the results show that convergence is conditional, meaning that productivity levels converge to country-specific steady states. Energy prices and wages are shown to positively affect energy- and labour-productivity growth, respectively. We also find evidence for the importance of economies of scale, whereas the investment share, openness and specialization play only a modest role in explaining cross-country variation in energy- and labour-productivity growth. {\circledC} 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.",
author = "P. Mulder and {de Groot}, H.L.F.",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1007/s10640-006-9042-y",
language = "English",
series = "CPB Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CPB",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CPB",

}

Sectoral energy- and labour-productivity convergence. / Mulder, P.; de Groot, H.L.F.

Den Haag : CPB, 2003. (CPB Discussion Paper).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Sectoral energy- and labour-productivity convergence

AU - Mulder, P.

AU - de Groot, H.L.F.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper empirically investigates the development of cross-country differences in energy- and labour productivity. The analysis is performed at a detailed sectoral level for 14 OECD countries, covering the period 1970-1997. A σ-convergence analysis reveals that the development over time of the cross-country variation in productivity performance differs across sectors as well as across different levels of aggregation. Both patterns of convergence as well as divergence are found. Cross-country variation of productivity levels is typically larger for energy than for labour. A β-convergence analysis provides support for the hypothesis that in most sectors lagging countries tend to catch up with technological leaders, in particular in terms of energy productivity. Moreover, the results show that convergence is conditional, meaning that productivity levels converge to country-specific steady states. Energy prices and wages are shown to positively affect energy- and labour-productivity growth, respectively. We also find evidence for the importance of economies of scale, whereas the investment share, openness and specialization play only a modest role in explaining cross-country variation in energy- and labour-productivity growth. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

AB - This paper empirically investigates the development of cross-country differences in energy- and labour productivity. The analysis is performed at a detailed sectoral level for 14 OECD countries, covering the period 1970-1997. A σ-convergence analysis reveals that the development over time of the cross-country variation in productivity performance differs across sectors as well as across different levels of aggregation. Both patterns of convergence as well as divergence are found. Cross-country variation of productivity levels is typically larger for energy than for labour. A β-convergence analysis provides support for the hypothesis that in most sectors lagging countries tend to catch up with technological leaders, in particular in terms of energy productivity. Moreover, the results show that convergence is conditional, meaning that productivity levels converge to country-specific steady states. Energy prices and wages are shown to positively affect energy- and labour-productivity growth, respectively. We also find evidence for the importance of economies of scale, whereas the investment share, openness and specialization play only a modest role in explaining cross-country variation in energy- and labour-productivity growth. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

U2 - 10.1007/s10640-006-9042-y

DO - 10.1007/s10640-006-9042-y

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CPB Discussion Paper

BT - Sectoral energy- and labour-productivity convergence

PB - CPB

CY - Den Haag

ER -