Selecting in or selecting out? Gender gaps and political methodology in Europe

Malu A.C. Gatto, Anita R. Gohdes, Denise Traber, Mariken A.C.G. Van Der Velden

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women's incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students' methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-127
Number of pages6
JournalPS, Political Science & Politics
Issue number1
Early online date29 Oct 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Selecting in or selecting out? Gender gaps and political methodology in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this