Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy: Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

People often consider themselves as more moral than average others (i.e., moral superiority) and present themselves as more moral than they actually are (i.e., moral hypocrisy). We examined whether feelings of moral superiority—as a manifestation of self-enhancement motives—motivates people’s hypocritical behavior, that is, their discrepant moral performances in public versus private settings. In three studies (total N = 1,151), participants distributed two tasks (one favorable and one unfavorable) between themselves and an anonymous partner, with the option of using an ostensibly fair randomizer (e.g., a self-prepared coin). We found that when experiencing feelings of moral superiority (vs. non-superiority), people, especially those who highly identified with moral values (Studies 1 and 2), were less likely to directly give themselves the favorable task, but they were not less likely to cheat in private after using the randomizer (Studies 1 to 3). Both self-enhancement motives and moral identity have implications for hypocritical behavior, by motivating public moral appearances but not private moral integrity.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0219382
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Emotions
Numismatics

Cite this

@article{bc034f9eadb24518a529ec63cd077ed4,
title = "Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy: Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances",
abstract = "People often consider themselves as more moral than average others (i.e., moral superiority) and present themselves as more moral than they actually are (i.e., moral hypocrisy). We examined whether feelings of moral superiority—as a manifestation of self-enhancement motives—motivates people’s hypocritical behavior, that is, their discrepant moral performances in public versus private settings. In three studies (total N = 1,151), participants distributed two tasks (one favorable and one unfavorable) between themselves and an anonymous partner, with the option of using an ostensibly fair randomizer (e.g., a self-prepared coin). We found that when experiencing feelings of moral superiority (vs. non-superiority), people, especially those who highly identified with moral values (Studies 1 and 2), were less likely to directly give themselves the favorable task, but they were not less likely to cheat in private after using the randomizer (Studies 1 to 3). Both self-enhancement motives and moral identity have implications for hypocritical behavior, by motivating public moral appearances but not private moral integrity.",
author = "Mengchen Dong and {van Prooijen}, {Jan Willem} and {van Lange}, {Paul A.M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0219382",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy : Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances. / Dong, Mengchen; van Prooijen, Jan Willem; van Lange, Paul A.M.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 7, e0219382, 05.07.2019, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-enhancement in moral hypocrisy

T2 - Moral superiority and moral identity are about better appearances

AU - Dong, Mengchen

AU - van Prooijen, Jan Willem

AU - van Lange, Paul A.M.

PY - 2019/7/5

Y1 - 2019/7/5

N2 - People often consider themselves as more moral than average others (i.e., moral superiority) and present themselves as more moral than they actually are (i.e., moral hypocrisy). We examined whether feelings of moral superiority—as a manifestation of self-enhancement motives—motivates people’s hypocritical behavior, that is, their discrepant moral performances in public versus private settings. In three studies (total N = 1,151), participants distributed two tasks (one favorable and one unfavorable) between themselves and an anonymous partner, with the option of using an ostensibly fair randomizer (e.g., a self-prepared coin). We found that when experiencing feelings of moral superiority (vs. non-superiority), people, especially those who highly identified with moral values (Studies 1 and 2), were less likely to directly give themselves the favorable task, but they were not less likely to cheat in private after using the randomizer (Studies 1 to 3). Both self-enhancement motives and moral identity have implications for hypocritical behavior, by motivating public moral appearances but not private moral integrity.

AB - People often consider themselves as more moral than average others (i.e., moral superiority) and present themselves as more moral than they actually are (i.e., moral hypocrisy). We examined whether feelings of moral superiority—as a manifestation of self-enhancement motives—motivates people’s hypocritical behavior, that is, their discrepant moral performances in public versus private settings. In three studies (total N = 1,151), participants distributed two tasks (one favorable and one unfavorable) between themselves and an anonymous partner, with the option of using an ostensibly fair randomizer (e.g., a self-prepared coin). We found that when experiencing feelings of moral superiority (vs. non-superiority), people, especially those who highly identified with moral values (Studies 1 and 2), were less likely to directly give themselves the favorable task, but they were not less likely to cheat in private after using the randomizer (Studies 1 to 3). Both self-enhancement motives and moral identity have implications for hypocritical behavior, by motivating public moral appearances but not private moral integrity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069269899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069269899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219382

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219382

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0219382

ER -