Sensitivity of atmospheric CO 2 growth rate to observed changes in terrestrial water storage

Vincent Humphrey*, Jakob Zscheischler, Philippe Ciais, Lukas Gudmundsson, Stephen Sitch, Sonia I. Seneviratne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Land ecosystems absorb on average 30 per cent of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, thereby slowing the increase of CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere 1 . Year-to-year variations in the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate are mostly due to fluctuating carbon uptake by land ecosystems 1 . The sensitivity of these fluctuations to changes in tropical temperature has been well documented 2–6 , but identifying the role of global water availability has proved to be elusive. So far, the only usable proxies for water availability have been time-lagged precipitation anomalies and drought indices 3–5 , owing to a lack of direct observations. Here, we use recent observations of terrestrial water storage changes derived from satellite gravimetry 7 to investigate terrestrial water effects on carbon cycle variability at global to regional scales. We show that the CO 2 growth rate is strongly sensitive to observed changes in terrestrial water storage, drier years being associated with faster atmospheric CO 2 growth. We demonstrate that this global relationship is independent of known temperature effects and is underestimated in current carbon cycle models. Our results indicate that interannual fluctuations in terrestrial water storage strongly affect the terrestrial carbon sink and highlight the importance of the interactions between the water and carbon cycles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)628-631
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume560
Issue number7720
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/J010154/1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of atmospheric CO 2 growth rate to observed changes in terrestrial water storage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this