Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials

Jeroen B. Guineé*, Reinout Heijungs, Martina G. Vijver, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although technological and environmental benefits are important stimuli for nanotechnology development, these technologies have been contested from an environmental point of view. The steady growth of applications of engineered nanomaterials has heated up the debate on quantifying the environmental repercussions. The two main scientific methods to address these environmental repercussions are risk assessment and life-cycle assessment. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these methods, and the relation between them, have been a topic of debate in the world of traditional chemistry for over two decades. Here we review recent developments in this debate in general and for the emerging field of nanomaterials specifically. We discuss the pros and cons of four schools of thought for combining and integrating risk assessment and life-cycle assessment and conclude with a plea for action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)727-733
Number of pages7
JournalNature Nanotechnology
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this